Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic value of American College of Radiology thyroid imaging report and data system (ACR TI-RADS) and 2011 Kwak TI-RADS in thyroid isthmic nodules.Methods:This retrospective study included 308 patients with 308 thyroid isthmic nodules diagnosed pathologically by fine needle aspiration biopsy or surgery at department of ultrasound, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2015 to January 2020. All nodules were classified according to the ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS classifications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the independent risk factors formalignant thyroid isthmic nodules.The ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS classifications results for the nodules were compared with the pathological results, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the two methods were plotted to assess their diagnostic efficiency.Results:Of the 308 thyroid isthmic nodules, 197 were malignant and 111 were benign. Compared with benign thyroid nodules, malignant nodules located in the isthmus were more likely to have the following ultrasonic features: solid type (99.5% vs 77.5%), hypo-/very hypo-echogenicity (94.9% vs 46.8%), taller-than-wide shape (21.3% vs 5.4%), lobulated or irregular or extra-thyroidal extension (41.1% vs 7.2%), and punctate echogenic foci (43.2% vs 11.7%); the differences of these features were statistically significant between the two groups (P＜0.05). Solid type (P=0.047), hypo-/very hypo-echogenicity (P＜0.001), lobulated or irregular or extra-thyroidal extension (P=0.002), and punctate echogenic foci (P=0.007) were independent risk factors for malignancy, while taller-than-wide shape was not an independent risk factor for malignancy (OR=2.683, P=0.050). All the ACR TR 1-2 nodules were benign. The malignancy rates of ACR TR 4 and 5 were 70.1%and 87.0%, respectively. All the Kwak TR 2-3 nodules were benign. The malignancy rates of Kwak TR 4b, 4c, and 5 were 70.0%, 83.2%, and 100%, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves of the ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS classifications were 0.823 and 0.820, respectively. The optimal cut-off values for diagnosing malignancy by ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS were ≥TR4 (total score ≥4 points) and ≥TR4b, and at these points, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Youden index were 99.5% vs 99.0%, 53.1% vs 53.1%, 82.8% vs 82.5%, 79.0% vs 78.9%, 98.3% vs 96.7%, and 0.526 vs 0.523, respectively.Conclusion:Both of the ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS have high diagnostic valuein diagnosing thyroid isthmic nodules. Further studies of TI-RADS are needed to assess the threshold of malignant risk and management in isthmic nodules.

The Diagnostic Efficacy of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System (TI-RADS) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules

ACR TI-RADS and ATA ultrasound classifications are helpful for the management of thyroid nodules located in the isthmus

Comparison of ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS for diagnosis of thyroid isthmic nodules

Effectiveness Evaluation of the Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System Proposed by American Radiological Society ( 2017 ) ( ACR-TIRADS) for Differential Diagnosis in Thyroid Nodules

Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Comparisons of Four Ultrasound Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems in Surgically Resected Nodules

Prospective Validation of an Ultrasound-Based Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) on 3980 Thyroid Nodules.

Comparisons of ACR TI-RADS, ATA Guidelines, Kwak TI-RADS, and KTA/KSThR Guidelines in Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules.

Diagnostic Performance of American College of Radiology TI-RADS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A Single-Center Retrospective Validation Study of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Does a Higher American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI‐RADS) Score Forecast an Increased Risk of Malignancy? A Correlation Study of ACR TI‐RADS with FNA Cytology in the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules

Accuracy of ultrasound in predicting thyroid malignancy: a comparative analysis of the ACR TI-RADS and ATA risk stratification systems

Modified American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and Modified Artificial Intelligence Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for Thyroid Nodules: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Value of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and Ultrasonographic Scoring System for Diagnosing Thyroid Nodules

Prospective validation of the thyroid imaging reporting and data system on thyroid nodules

Verification and Comparisons of Different Ultrasound Risk‐stratification Systems in the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules

Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Assessment of Cytological Bethesda Category III Thyroid Nodules

Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Nodule Risk Stratification Systems: Comparison of ACR-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, K-TIRADS, and ATA Guidelines

Cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules: increased diagnostic performance with combination of US TI-RADS and a new scoring system

Evaluation of thyroid nodules with coexistent Hashimoto’s thyroiditis according to various ultrasound-based risk stratification systems:A retrospective research

A Modified Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (Mti-Rads) for Thyroid Nodules in Coexisting Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis

A Proposal to Stratify the Intermediate-Risk Thyroid Nodules According to the AACE/ACE/AME Guidelines with Ultrasound Features