Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic value of American College of Radiology thyroid imaging report and data system (ACR TI-RADS) and 2011 Kwak TI-RADS in thyroid isthmic nodules.Methods:This retrospective study included 308 patients with 308 thyroid isthmic nodules diagnosed pathologically by fine needle aspiration biopsy or surgery at department of ultrasound, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2015 to January 2020. All nodules were classified according to the ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS classifications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the independent risk factors formalignant thyroid isthmic nodules.The ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS classifications results for the nodules were compared with the pathological results, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the two methods were plotted to assess their diagnostic efficiency.Results:Of the 308 thyroid isthmic nodules, 197 were malignant and 111 were benign. Compared with benign thyroid nodules, malignant nodules located in the isthmus were more likely to have the following ultrasonic features: solid type (99.5% vs 77.5%), hypo-/very hypo-echogenicity (94.9% vs 46.8%), taller-than-wide shape (21.3% vs 5.4%), lobulated or irregular or extra-thyroidal extension (41.1% vs 7.2%), and punctate echogenic foci (43.2% vs 11.7%); the differences of these features were statistically significant between the two groups (P＜0.05). Solid type (P=0.047), hypo-/very hypo-echogenicity (P＜0.001), lobulated or irregular or extra-thyroidal extension (P=0.002), and punctate echogenic foci (P=0.007) were independent risk factors for malignancy, while taller-than-wide shape was not an independent risk factor for malignancy (OR=2.683, P=0.050). All the ACR TR 1-2 nodules were benign. The malignancy rates of ACR TR 4 and 5 were 70.1%and 87.0%, respectively. All the Kwak TR 2-3 nodules were benign. The malignancy rates of Kwak TR 4b, 4c, and 5 were 70.0%, 83.2%, and 100%, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves of the ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS classifications were 0.823 and 0.820, respectively. The optimal cut-off values for diagnosing malignancy by ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS were ≥TR4 (total score ≥4 points) and ≥TR4b, and at these points, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Youden index were 99.5% vs 99.0%, 53.1% vs 53.1%, 82.8% vs 82.5%, 79.0% vs 78.9%, 98.3% vs 96.7%, and 0.526 vs 0.523, respectively.Conclusion:Both of the ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS have high diagnostic valuein diagnosing thyroid isthmic nodules. Further studies of TI-RADS are needed to assess the threshold of malignant risk and management in isthmic nodules.

Verification and Comparisons of Different Ultrasound Risk‐stratification Systems in the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules

[Exploration on an Ultrasonographic Imaging Reporting and Data System in Malignancy Grading of Thyroid Nodules].

Comparison of ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS for diagnosis of thyroid isthmic nodules

ACR TI-RADS and ATA ultrasound classifications are helpful for the management of thyroid nodules located in the isthmus

Comparison analysis of five ultrasound malignancy risk stratification guidelines for thyroid nodules

Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Nodule Risk Stratification Systems: Comparison of ACR-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, K-TIRADS, and ATA Guidelines

Evaluation of thyroid nodules with coexistent Hashimoto’s thyroiditis according to various ultrasound-based risk stratification systems:A retrospective research

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Role of Different Ultrasound-Based Thyroid Malignancy Risk Stratification Systems for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.

The value of combined scoring of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and ultrasonic elastography in the differential diagnosis of TI-RADS 4 nodules

Revised Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS): imitating the American College of Radiology TIRADS, a single-center retrospective study

Diagnostic efficiency among Eu-/C-/ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study

A Single-Center Retrospective Validation Study of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Diagnostic performance of six ultrasound-based risk stratification systems in thyroid follicular neoplasm: A retrospective multi-center study

Comparative Study of C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS for Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules

[Applicational Value of 2017 ACR TI-RADS Stratification in Diagnosing Thyroid Nodules].

Comparative Analysis of AI-SONICTM Thyroid System and Six Thyroid Risk Stratification Guidelines in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Value of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and Ultrasonographic Scoring System for Diagnosing Thyroid Nodules

Simplifying risk stratification for thyroid nodules on ultrasound: validation and performance of an artificial intelligence thyroid imaging reporting and data system

Is Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems superior to American College of Radiology or American Thyroid Association guidelines for consistency and efficacy in the diagnosis of thyroid cancer?

Performance of current ultrasound-based malignancy risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules in patients with follicular neoplasms