Abstract:Does vitrification and warming of Day 3 embryos have an impact on neonatal outcome when compared with Day 3 embryos that are slow cooled and thawed, or with embryos from a fresh cycle?The median birthweight was higher in the vitrified group versus the slow cooled or fresh embryo transfer, and the rate of low birthweight in twin babies was lower in the vitrified group.Vitrification has been successfully used for cryopreserving human oocytes and blastocyst-stage embryos. Most published studies looking at the neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified embryos refer to blastocyst-stage embryos. Information on children born after transfer of Day 3 vitrified embryos is relatively rare.A retrospective, single-centre study of children born after Day 3 embryo transfer from fresh, slow frozen or vitrified embryos during the period January 2006 to May 2011 was conducted. Each patient contributed only one cycle per group. Children born were followed-up at 730 days after delivery. Outcome measures include obstetric and neonatal outcomes, which were evaluated by medical records and questionnaires sent to parents.Patients underwent transfer of vitrified Day 3 embryos (n 2617 transfers, Cryotop method), slow frozen Day 3 embryos (n 4681) and fresh Day 3 embryos (n 9194). All cycles were performed at the Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics IVF Institute.Frequencies of hypertensive disorder, gestational diabetes, placenta previa and abruptio placenta were similar in all groups. Five hundred and forty five, 986 and 1914 singleton babies were born from vitrified, slow freezing and fresh transfers, and the median gestational ages were 38.7, 38.7 and 38.7 weeks, respectively. Preterm birth (3237 weeks) occurred in 7.5, 9.2 and 7.8 of the vitrified, slow freeze and fresh groups, respectively. The median birthweight from vitrified embryos (3455.3 g) was higher than that from slow freezing (3352.3 g) and fresh (3355.8 g) transfers (P 0.0001 for both). The rate of perinatal mortality was 0.4 for all transfer groups. Three hundred and eighty two, 734 and 1322 twin babies were born from vitrified, slow freezing and fresh transfers, respectively. There were no differences among groups in mean gestational age and in the rate of preterm birth. The median birthweight for babies born from vitrified embryos (2587.4 g) was higher than that from the slow freezing (2538.8 g) or fresh (2494.4 g) transfer groups (vitrified versus fresh: P 0.0015; vitrified versus slow freeze: P 0.049). The rate of low birthweight (15002500 g) from vitrified (30.4) was lower than that from fresh (36.2) transfer (P 0.034).The main limitation of this study is that the obstetric and neonatal data were obtained by questionnaires sent to the parents without checking medical records. This is, especially, problematic for reporting on congenital malformations, so birth defects were excluded from the data.Transfer of vitrified and warmed Day 3 embryos does not seem to have an adverse effect on neonatal outcome. Children born following the transfer of vitrified embryos seem to have a higher birthweight when compared with those of fresh or slow frozen embryos.This study received no outside funding and none of the authors has any conflict of interest.

The Impact of Blastomere Loss on Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes of Vitrified-Warmed Day3 Embryos in Single Embryo Transfer Cycles.

Predictive Value of the Number of Frozen Blastocysts in Live Birth Rates of the Transferred Fresh Embryos

The effect of blastomere loss during frozen embryo transfer on the transcriptome of offspring’s umbilical cord blood

Outcomes of Neonates Born Following Transfers of Frozen-Thawed Cleavage-Stage Embryos with Blastomere Loss: a Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study

The influence of blastomere damage of frozen-thawed embryos on clinical outcomes of complete embryo transplantation

Impact of Blastmere Survival and Resumption of Cleavage on the Outcome of Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer

Analysis of Biochemical and Clinical Pregnancy Loss Between Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer of Blastocysts and Day 3 Cleavage Embryos in Young Women: A Comprehensive Comparison

Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes after Transfer of Vitrified Early Cleavage Embryos

Impact of blastomeres loss on the viability of thawed good-quality embryos

Outcomes of embryo vitrification at different developmental stages

Miscarriage Rate Is High With Frozen-Thawed Blastocysts Arising From Poor-Quality Cleavage Stage Embryos

Impact of Day 7 Blastocyst Transfer on Obstetric and Perinatal Outcome of Singletons Born after Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer

Twice vitrification-warming procedures has no effect on frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes

Storage Time Does Not Influence Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes for First Single Vitrified High-Quality Blastocyst Transfer Cycle.

Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes Following Blastocyst and Cleavage-Stage Embryo Transfer: Analysis of 10 Years' Data from a Single Centre.

The Risk of Birth Defects among Children Born after Vitrified Blastocyst Transfers and Those Born after Fresh and Vitrified Cleavage-Stage Embryo Transfers

Effect of Repeated Cryopreservation on Human Embryo Developmental Potential.

Effect of Vitrification on Clinical Outcomes of Cleavage-Stage Embryos with Poor Quality in Human Embryo Cryopreservation

Poor Embryo Quality is Associated with A Higher Risk of Low Birthweight in Vitrified-Warmed Single Embryo Transfer Cycles

Impact of blastomere survival on implantation rate of frozen-thawed embryo transfer

Impact of Embryo Factors on Clinical Outcome in Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles