The effect of re-cryopreservation on embryo viability and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Xiangfei Wang,Ruolin Mao,Meng Wang,Rui Long,Lei Jin,Lixia Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.03.001
IF: 6.7
2023-03-22
Fertility and Sterility
Abstract:Importance There is a lack of consensus and reliable evidence regarding the impact of re-cryopreservation technique on human embryos, particularly with respect to embryo viability and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. Objective To investigate the impact of re-cryopreservation on embryo viability and IVF outcomes by comparing to single cryopreservation. Data sources Databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched until 10 October 2022. Study selection and synthesis All the comparative studies comparing embryonic outcomes and IVF outcomes between repeated and single cryopreservation of embryos were included. The random-effect and fixed-effect meta-analysis model were used to pool the odds ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analysis was performed based on different methods of cryopreservation and different time of embryo cryopreservation/transfer. Main outcomes Outcomes referring to embryo survival, IVF outcomes (including clinical pregnancy rate, embryo implantation rate, miscarriage rate and live birth rate) and neonatal outcomes (including low birth weight rate and preterm birth rate) were evaluated. Results Fourteen studies were eligible for the present meta-analysis, involving 4525 embryo transfer cycles in total (3270 cycles with single cryopreservation (control group) and 1255 with re-cryopreservation (experimental group)). A decreased embryo survival rate (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.96; P = 0.04) and clinical pregnancy rate (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.96; P = 0.04) were found in embryos re-cryopreserved by slow freezing. The live birth rate of re-vitrified embryos was also notably affected (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94; P = 0.02). Overall, re-cryopreservation resulted in a decreased live birth rate (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.90; P = 0.007) and an increased miscarriage rate (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.16-1.98; P = 0.003) compared with single cryopreservation. No significant difference was found in neonatal outcomes. When embryos were cryopreserved and transferred at the blastocyst stage, both the embryo implantation rate (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.89; P = 0.01) and live birth rate (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.96; P = 0.03) were significantly different between two groups. Conclusion and relevance The present meta-analysis suggested re-cryopreservation, compared to single cryopreservation, can lead to impaired embryo viability and lower rate of IVF success, with no affected neonatal outcomes. Clinicians and embryologists should retain a cautious attitude towards re-cryopreservation strategies.
obstetrics & gynecology,reproductive biology