Abstract:BACKGROUND:The aim of this study was to compare the pathological and perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic transverse colon cancer resection.METHODS:In this retrospective study, patients from seven institutions in China who underwent laparoscopic resection of transverse colon cancer between 2019 and 2021 were selected and included. Either extended right hemicolectomy or transverse colectomy/extended left hemicolectomy was performed. The clinical characteristics and the pathological and perioperative outcomes were compared between patients undergoing extracorporeal or intracorporeal anastomosis. Resection margin lengths were measured on formalin-fixed specimens and an inadequate margin was defined as less than 4.2 cm between the division and the tumour. The outcome of interest was the prevalence of specimens with an inadequate margin. Length of incision, bowel function recovery, hospital stay, early postoperative pain (first day after surgery), 30-day complications, and nodal harvest were investigated as secondary outcomes.RESULTS:Of 411 patients treated during the study interval, 370 patients with transverse colon cancer were included (23.2 per cent treated with intracorporeal anastomosis and 76.8 per cent treated with extracorporeal anastomosis). The prevalence of specimens with inadequate margins was lower in the intracorporeal anastomosis group compared with the extracorporeal anastomosis group in patients undergoing extended right hemicolectomy (P = 0.045) and in patients undergoing transverse colectomy/extended left hemicolectomy (P = 0.030). In multivariate analysis, extracorporeal anastomosis (OR 2.94 (95 per cent c.i. 1.33 to 6.49), P = 0.008) and transverse colectomy/extended left hemicolectomy (OR 1.75 (95 per cent c.i. 1.03 to 2.96), P = 0.038) were independent risk factors for specimens with an inadequate margin. Intracorporeal anastomosis was associated with a shorter incision length (P < 0.001), an earlier recovery of bowel function (P = 0.035), a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.042), less early postoperative pain (P < 0.001), a longer specimen length (P = 0.042), a longer resection margin (P = 0.007), and a greater lymph node harvest (P = 0.036). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day complications.CONCLUSION:Patients with transverse colon cancer have better perioperative outcomes, fewer margins of less than 4.2 cm, and larger lymph node harvests when the anastomosis is performed intracorporeally. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT05061199 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Laparoscopic Management of Spontaneous Colonic Perforation: A Single Institution Study of 52 Patients

Comparison of two laparoscopic splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization techniques for management of portal hypertension and hypersplenism

Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for repairing colonoscopic perforation: a multicenter study

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colonoscopic Perforation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Reevaluation of laparoscopic surgery's value in pathological T4 colon cancer with comparison to open surgery: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study.

Laparoscopic versus open management of duodenal perforation: a comparative study at a District General Hospital

Laparoscopic direct suture of perforation after diagnostic colonoscopy

Validity of laparoscopic surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforations

Outcomes of laparoscopic modified Cellan-Jones repair versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer at a community hospital

Risk Factors for Postoperative Major Morbidity, Anastomotic Leakage, Re-Surgery and Mortality in Patients with Colonic Perforation

Comparison of the risk of postoperative wound infection in patients with rectal cancer by laparoscopic versus open Hartmann's surgery

[A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Repair Versus Open Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcers].

Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: A retrospective cohort study

Surgical Outcomes in Adults with Acute Small Bowel Perforation and Risk Factors for Mortality: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Laparoscopic splenectomy: a surgeon’s experience of 302 patients with analysis of postoperative complications

Clinical analysis of 45 cases of perforation were identified during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedure

Strictureplasties performed by laparoscopic approach for complicated Crohn's disease. A prospective, observational, cohort study

Laparoscopic extraperitoneal colostomy has a lower risk of parastomal hernia and bowel obstruction than transperitoneal colostomy

Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair

Meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of acute laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers

Pathological and Perioperative Outcomes of Extracorporeal Versus Intracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Transverse Colon Cancer Resection: Retrospective Multicentre Study.