Abstract:Past research offers conflicting findings on whether sadness-evoking charity appeals help solicit a donation. To reconcile these findings, we introduce prospective donors’ regulatory focus as a moderator for understanding when and why sadness appeals motivate or demotivate giving. Specifically, we propose that the sense of helplessness or loss of control associated with sadness appeals increases donors’ sensitivity to advertiser’s manipulative persuasion tactics, as those tactics can threaten donors’ control over their donation decision. As a result, sadness appeals are more likely to activate persuasion knowledge among prevention- (vs. promotion-) oriented donors who tend to be vigilant against manipulative persuasion attempts. Across six main studies and two supplementary studies, we find that a prevention (vs. promotion) focus discourages charitable giving when it is solicited using a sadness appeal, whereas regulatory focus does not affect the giving when other emotion appeals (e.g., happiness appeal or guilt appeal) are used. We find that a prevention (vs. promotion) focus demotivates donation solicited by a sadness appeal because it activates persuasion knowledge that evaluates solicitor’s motive behind the sadness appeal, resulting in increased skepticism, dampened feelings of sympathy, and consequently, reduced charitable giving. However, when persuasion knowledge is deactivated (e.g., when donors’ cognitive capacity is constrained or the soliciting charity has a reliable reputation), regulatory focus no longer affects donor skepticism, sympathy, and charitable giving, even when a sadness appeal is used to call for donation.

Does Dignity Matter? A Study of Donors’ Behavior

Helping Yourself Before Helping Others: How Sense of Control Promotes Charitable Behaviors

How Donor's Regulatory Focus Changes the Effectiveness of a Sadness-Evoking Charity Appeal

When Sadness-Evoking Charity Appeals Demotivate Charitable Giving

Nostalgia: The gift that keeps on giving

Money Helps when Money Feels: Money Anthropomorphism Increases Charitable Giving

The power of specific emotion analysis in predicting donations: A comparative empirical study between sentiment and specific emotion analysis in social media

The Impact of Mortality Salience on the Relative Effectiveness of Donation Appeals

How do emotions affect giving? Examining the effects of textual and facial emotions in charitable crowdfunding

Underlying Mechanism to the Identifiable Victim Effect in Collective Donation Action Intentions: Does Emotional Reactions and Perceived Responsibility Matter?

Cultural Differences in Donation Decision-Making

Emotions Matter: Understanding the Relationship Between Drivers of Volunteering and Participation

Click to contribute: understanding donation behaviour and well-being in donation-based crowdfunding mobile apps

Empathy Impairs Virtue: the Influence of Empathy and Vulnerability on Charitable Giving.

Can Happiness and Sadness Overcome Organ Donation Barriers Following Exposure to Radio Ads?

Charitable Maximizers: The Impact of the Maximizing Mindset on Donations to Human Recipients

Charity ugliness premium: Donors' empathy for unattractiveness during the COVID‐19 pandemic and implications for charity advertising

Testing the Influence of Donation Message-framing, Donation Size, and Product Type (Androgynous Luxury: Hedonic Vs. Eco-friendly: Utilitarian) on CRM Participation Intention

Sad but smiling? How the combination of happy victim images and sad message appeals increase prosocial behavior

To donate or not to donate? How cosmopolitanism and brand anthropomorphism influence donation intentions for international humanitarian causes

Identity motives in charitable giving: Explanations for charity preferences from a global donor survey