Earthquake Induced Liquefaction Response of Subway Structure in Liquefiable Soil
LIU Hua-bei,SONG Er-xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2005.03.009
2005-01-01
Rock and soil mechanics
Abstract:Based on the theories of coupled interaction in saturated soil and dynamic soil-structure interaction, the response of subway structure in fully saturated liquefiable soil under earthquake excitation is investigated using the effective-stress based finite element program Dyna-Swandyne-II. A generalized plasticity model, Pastor-Zienkiewicz III model, is used to model the cyclic behavior of soil; and finite element procedure based on the u-p form of Biot theory is employed to conduct the coupled analysis. The nonlinearity of the interaction between soil and subway structure is fully considered. The dynamic response of subway structure, including the internal forces, the acceleration, and the vertical and horizontal displacements, are analyzed. The results showed that the subway structure may uplift due to the earthquake induced liquefaction, which shall lead to severe damage in the structure; and that the maximum seismic internal forces occurred at the connections of the structure elements and their reinforcement must be carefully designed. ZOU De-gao, KONG Xian-jing, LING H I, et al. Experimental study on the uplift behavior of pipeline in saturated sand foundation earthquake resistant measures during an earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechn- ical Engineering, 2002, 24(3): 323-326. [6] Chan A H C. User manual for Diana Swandyne-II[R]. Glasgow: University of Glasgow, 1989. [7] Katona M G, Zienkiewicz O C. A unified set of single step algorithms Part 3: The Beta-m method, a generalization of the newmark scheme[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1985, 21: 1 345-1 359. [8] Zienkiewicz O C, Chan A H C, Pastor M, Schrefler B A, Shiomi T. Computational Geomechanics with Special Reference to Earthquake Engineering[M]. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1998. [9] Chan A H C, Famiyesin O O, Muir W D. Numerical prediction for model No. 1[A]. Arulanandan K, Scott R F. Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems[C]. Rotterdam: Balkema AA, 1994. 87-108. [10] Madabhushi S P G, Zeng X. Seismic response of gravity quay wall. II: numerical modeling[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineering, 1998, 124(5): 418-427. [11] Pastor M, Zienkiewicz O C, Chan A H C. Generalized plasticity and the modeling of soil behavior[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1990, 14: 151-190. [12] Smith I M. A overview of numerical procedures used in VELACS project[A]. Arulanandan K, Scott R F. Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems[C]. Rotterdam: Balkema AA, 1994. [13] Hushmand B, Scott R F, Crouse C B. Centrifuge liquefaction tests in a laminar box[J]. Geotechnique, 1988, 38: 253-262.