Abstract:Does carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) make sense in the oil sands? The rapid expansion of oil sands production in northern Alberta is under scrutiny worldwide due to concerns about its environmental, social, and economic impacts. Environmental concerns include climate change impacts from CO 2 emissions along with more local environmental impacts such as dead birds, cancer clusters, and destruction of boreal forests. Within Canada, oil sands have become an important driver of economic growth, so producers and governments are under simultaneous pressure to reduce environmental impacts while maintaining their economic competitiveness (1-5). The environmental footprint of oil sands production is hotly contested; here we aim to clarify divergent claims about CO 2 emissions by exploring how various choices about the scale of analysis (i.e., system boundaries) determine the emissions estimates, the technologies available to reduce emissions, and perspectives and strategies of stakeholders (Table 1). We pay particular attention to carbon capture and storage (CCS), showing how divergent views about its cost-effectiveness emerge from divergent choices about the scale of analysis. Debate about the future of oil sands development is so contentious that even the name of the resource is disputed: proponents typically use oil sands while opponents use tar sands. We use oil sands not to express our views on the debate, but because tar is technically incorrect because tars are products of biomass combustion and are chemically distinct from bitumen. The source material is neither oil nor tar but bitumen, but is most generally described as an example of ultraheavy oil. Oil sands are a mixture of bitumen, sand, and water. Alberta's oil sands are second only to Saudi Arabia in terms of the size of oil reserves globally (1). The recovery, extraction, and processing of bitumen to products such as transportation fuels are energy intensive processes, using mostly natural gas and electricity, and consequently result in significant greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions. Roughly 1.3 million barrels-per-day (bpd) of bitumen (∼1.5% of world demand) is produced through two extraction techniques; surface mining and in situ recovery (6, 7). Surface mining (∼55% of current production) is used in shallow oil sands reserves using open-pit mines where the bitumen is then extracted using hot water. In situ production (∼45% of current production) from underground reservoirs uses both cold and thermal technologies to recover and extract the bitumen and move it to the surface (7). There is no clear environmental winner between …

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Canadian Oil Sands Supply Chains to China

The Development of a Techno-Economic Model for the Extraction, Transportation, Upgrading, and Shipping of Canadian Oil Sands Products to the Asia-Pacific Region

Shore Power Management for Green Shipping under International River Transportation

A Well-to-wire Life Cycle Assessment of Canadian Shale Gas for Electricity Generation in China

Using infrastructure optimization to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from oil sands extraction and processing

Historical trends in greenhouse gas emissions of the Alberta oil sands (1970–2010)

The Truth about Dirty Oil: Is Ccs the Answer? Current Oil Sands Operations, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Energy Use

Geospatial Life Cycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from US Liquefied Natural Gas Supply Chains

Methane projections from Canada's oil sands tailings using scientific deep learning reveal significant underestimation

A Comprehensive Assessment of the Integration of Solvent and Steam for the Extraction of Bitumen Through the Development of Novel Process Models

Tapping into the potential CO 2 emission reduction of a crude oil transportation system from carbon footprint perspective

Quantification of Methane Emissions from Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand Extraction in Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada

A Hybrid Scenario Analysis for the Selection of Future Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Technologies in China’s Oil and Gas Industry

LCA OF BIO-ETHANOL AND BIO-DIESEL PATHWAYS IN CHINA

A Techno-Economic Study of Shipping Lng to the Asia-Pacific from Western Canada by Lng Carrier

A Case Study of Container Ships

Carbon footprint of oil products pipeline transportation

Evaluating the energy consumption and air emissions of CO2-enhanced oil recovery in China: A partial life cycle assessment of extralow permeability reservoirs

A Comprehensive Integration and Synthesis of Methane Emissions from Canada's Oil and Gas Value Chain

Carbon implications of marginal oils from market-derived demand shocks

Environmental impact and damage assessment of oil trunkline transportation by life cycle assessment method