Environmental impact and damage assessment of oil trunkline transportation by life cycle assessment method

Amir hosein Saedi,Yeganeh Aliabadi,Abolfazl Ahmadi,Hamed Mirzavand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1719
IF: 4.0349
2024-03-06
Energy Science & Engineering
Abstract:This study presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment model evaluating the carbon footprint of crude oil pipelines in Iran, encompassing the entire lifecycle from extraction to disposal. Results indicate substantial environmental impacts, with marine and terrestrial ecotoxicity, as well as fossil resource scarcity, identified as primary concerns. Endpoint analysis reveals variations in impacts on human health and ecosystems across different pipeline stations. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, oil companies, and stakeholders to devise strategies aimed at mitigating the environmental impact of oil transportation in Iran. As climate issues gradually attract public attention worldwide, the operation of crude oil pipelines has been attached with new emission‐reduction targets. Though previous studies concerning life cycle assessment (LCA) of oil and gas pipelines have estimated the carbon footprint to some extent, there is a lack of research on life cycle carbon emissions that take the process of crude oil pipelines transportation. the main objective of this study is to build a comprehensive LCA model of carbon footprint for crude oil pipeline systems. A gate‐to‐gate analysis is provided for the LCA model, which means that the entire pipeline's life cycle from the extraction to disposal is considered. The LCA approach used both midpoint and endpoint impact assessment methods to evaluate the environmental impacts of crude oil pipeline transportation in Iran. The study analyzed the major environmental impact categories, such as greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, water usage, and solid waste generation. The results showed that the crude oil pipelines transportation has significant environmental impacts in Iran. The three highest impacts on the midpoint scale are marine ecotoxicity by 61.54 kg 1,4‐DCB, terrestrial ecotoxicity by 52.26 kg 1,4‐DCB and fossil resource scarcity by 40.22 kg oil eq. The endpoint impacts of three stations were also compared. The Chamran, Abadan and Zanganeh stations have 95.44%, 94.22%, and 6% impacts on human health, respectively. Also, Abadan station has the largest amount of damage to ecosystems and resources with 96.65% and 80.02%, respectively. The findings of this study could be used by policymakers, oil companies, and other stakeholders to make informed decisions and implement strategies to reduce the environmental impact of oil transportation in Iran.
energy & fuels
What problem does this paper attempt to address?