The Good-on-Paper Effect: How the Decision Context Influences Virtuous Behavior

Maferima Toure-Tillery,Lili Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2021.1347

2022-01-01

Marketing Science

Abstract:We document the “good-on-paper effect,” whereby people make more virtuous decisions on paper than on a digital device (e.g., tablet).

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Diverging Effects of Clean Versus Dirty Money on Attitudes, Values, and Interpersonal Behavior.

Qing Yang,Xiaochang Wu,Xinyue Zhou,Nicole L. Mead,Kathleen D. Vohs,Roy F. Baumeister

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030596

IF: 8.46

2013-01-01

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract:Does the cue of money lead to selfish, greedy, exploitative behaviors or to fairness, exchange, and reciprocity? We found evidence for both, suggesting that people have both sets of meaningful associations, which can be differentially activated by exposure to clean versus dirty money. In a field experiment at a farmers' market, vendors who handled dirty money subsequently cheated customers, whereas those who handled clean money gave fair value (Experiment 1). In laboratory studies with economic games, participants who had previously handled and counted dirty money tended toward selfish, unfair practices-unlike those who had counted clean money or dirty paper, both of which led to fairness and reciprocity. These patterns were found with the trust game (Experiment 2), the prisoner's dilemma (Experiment 4), the ultimatum game (Experiment 5), and the dictator game (Experiment 6). Cognitive measures indicated that exposure to dirty money lowered moral standards (Experiment 3) and reduced positive attitudes toward fairness and reciprocity (Experiments 6-7), whereas exposure to clean money had the opposite effects. Thus, people apparently have 2 contradictory sets of associations (including behavioral tendencies) to money, which is a complex, powerful, and ubiquitous aspect of human social life and cultural organization.
Green is the New White: How Virtue Motivates Green Product Purchase

Nathalie Spielmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04493-6

IF: 6.331

2020-04-04

Journal of Business Ethics

Abstract:It is important to understand the drivers of green consumption, because of growing concern for the health of the planet. In this paper, the assumption that a virtue-green product relationship exists is tested. The objective is to understand how product morality (versus that of the person using it) can influence the valuation of green products. Relying on virtue theory and positive spillover as conceptual bases, the research implicitly and explicitly tests and confirms green (versus conventional) product virtue. The results demonstrate that perceived green product virtue leads to positive emotions, which explain heightened purchase intentions. In line with the conceptualization, I show that the effect is moderated by the importance consumers place on their own morality (i.e., cultivating personal virtue). Importantly, explicitly framing green products as virtuous activates positive spillover (i.e., prosocial behavior) by consumers; when green products are branded with a virtue cue, they encourage consumers to be more virtuous. Beyond being perceived as better people, when consumers interact with green products they effectively engage in more moral acts, such as making donations. The results confirm the perception of green products as moral agents and provide marketers with insights into the marketing value of virtue cues in green product consumption.

business,ethics
Is Money Worth Saving? Money Anthropomorphism Increases Saving Behavior

Lili Wang,Sara Kim,Xinyue Zhou

2017-01-01

Abstract:4.5 New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism: Examining the Role of Anthropomorphism in Financial Decision-Making and Consumer Welfare - no. 1
Mindset Switching Increases the Use of 'Want-Based' over 'Should-Based' Behaviors

Jin Yan,Nan-Nan Zhang,Dai-Xuan Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196269

IF: 3.7

2018-01-01

PLoS ONE

Abstract:This study examines the consequences of mindset switching on behavioral choices in want/- should conflicts. Building on the insights of the ego depletion literature, we propose that mindset switching depletes individuals' self-control resources and therefore prompts the choice of want behavior, which provides immediate pleasure, over should behavior, which provides long-term utility. Four laboratory experiments with university students that stimulated individuals to switch mindsets were conducted to test our hypotheses. Experiment 1 demonstrated that switching between individualist and collectivist mindsets increased the subjects' tendency to prefer popular magazines over scientific journals. Experiment 2 replicated the results by testing the relationship between an abstract/concrete mindset-switching task and want/should online behavioral choices. The mediating effect of ego depletion was also supported. Experiment 3 retested the main effect of language-switching on reading choices, and the mediating effect of ego-depletion. Experiment 3 also tested the moderating effect of the Need for Cognition, and eliminated the alternative explanation of cognitive fatigue. In Experiment 4, actual food choices were used as the direct measure of want/- should behaviors to test the robustness of our findings. The results consistently supported our hypotheses that mindset switching has significant effects on behavioral choices in terms of overindulgence, such as increasing want behavior and thus foregoing should behavior.
Doing good vs. avoiding bad in prosocial choice: A refined test and extension of the morality preference hypothesis

Ben M. Tappin,Valerio Capraro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.005

IF: 3.532

2018-11-01

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Abstract:Prosociality is fundamental to human social life, and, accordingly, much research has attempted to explain human prosocial behavior. Capraro and Rand (Judgment and Decision Making, 13, 99–111, 2018) recently provided experimental evidence that prosociality in anonymous, one-shot interactions (such as Prisoner's Dilemma and Dictator Game experiments) is not driven by outcome-based social preferences – as classically assumed – but by a generalized morality preference for “doing the right thing”. Here we argue that the key experiments reported in Capraro and Rand (2018) comprise prominent methodological confounds and open questions that bear on influential psychological theory. Specifically, their design confounds: (i) preferences for efficiency with self-interest; and (ii) preferences for action with preferences for morality. Furthermore, their design fails to dissociate the preference to do “good” from the preference to avoid doing “bad”. We thus designed and conducted a preregistered, refined and extended test of the morality preference hypothesis (N = 801). Consistent with this hypothesis, our findings indicate that prosociality in the anonymous, one-shot Dictator Game is driven by preferences for doing the morally right thing. Inconsistent with influential psychological theory, however, our results suggest the preference to do “good” was as potent as the preference to avoid doing “bad” in this case.

psychology, social
The benefit of virtue signaling: Corporate sleight-of-hand positively influences consumers' judgments about "social license to operate"

Sara Goto Gray,Bernadette Sütterlin,Michael Siegrist,Joseph Árvai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110047

2020-04-15

Abstract:When confronted with concerns or backlash as a result of their environmental or sustainability performance, companies may elect to address them head-on by directly correcting their real or perceived misdeeds. However, it is often the case that businesses are unwilling or unable to address their transgressions directly; in these cases, they may elect to draw attention to indirect substantiality benefits unfolding in areas unrelated to where the concerns or backlash initially arose. In this study, we sought to test the effect of these indirect and direct responses to sustainability challenges on two dependent variables: public perception of company reputation, and their willingness to grant a company "social license" for future business activities. Compared to a business-as-usual control condition, and across three company contexts, consumers provided favorable ratings of reputation, and were willing to grant social license, when companies responded indirectly to a sustainability challenge. These results highlight the powerful effect of indirect responses, which may be perceived as "greenwash", and the importance of intuitive judgmental heuristics and individual value orientations when consumers form impressions about corporate sustainability.
The Effect of Preceding Self-Control on Green Consumption Behavior: the Moderating Role of Moral Elevation.

Mei Li,Min Tan,Shibei Wang,Jin Li,Guanfei Zhang,Yiping Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s341786

IF: 3.974

2021-01-01

Psychology Research and Behavior Management

Abstract:BACKGROUND:Studies have shown that individuals restrain their egoistic desires to benefit others (eg, the natural world), which require a higher-order psychological process, such as self-control. Therefore, performing a preceding self-control task may subsequently decrease green consumption behavior. However, whether and how moral elevation, which is an important type of positive incidental emotion, moderates the negative effect of exerting self-control on green consumption behavior remains unknown.PURPOSE:The present study aimed to examine how exerting self-control and moral elevation influenced green consumption behavior.METHODS:The product choice task that requires participants to make choices between buying environmentally friendly (eco-friendly) and cheaper (self-interest) products is an index of green consumption behavior. In Experiment 1, we adopted the incongruent Stroop task to induce the exertion of self-control, and participants were asked to make choices in the product choice task. In Experiment 2, participants were provided with moral elevating videos to elicit moral elevation during the interval between the Stroop and product choice tasks.RESULTS:Experiment 1 indicated that, relative to the congruent Stroop task (the control condition), completing the incongruent Stroop task led to less environmentally friendly choices. Experiment 2 indicated that the participants who watched the elevating video in the incongruent Stroop task condition chose environmentally friendly products with greater frequency compared to those who watched the neutral video. Furthermore, the analyses showed that self-reported moral elevation partly moderated the effect of the exertion of self-control on green consumption behavior.CONCLUSION:Our findings indicate that the exertion of self-control has a negative effect on green consumption behavior; however, moral elevation can counteract this negative effect of exerting self-control on green consumption behavior.
Doing well by doing good: The effect of purchasing poverty-alleviation products on consumers' subsequent product preference in live streaming shopping

Tong Chen,Shida Tang,Zijin Shao,Juan He,Xiaoyu Zhang,Pei Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107753

IF: 9.9

2023-03-23

Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract:Live streaming shopping as a new e-commerce model has exploded in recent years. Broadcasters sell poverty alleviation products (PAP) on their live channels as a way to engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. The objective of this research is to examine the effect of purchasing PAP on consumers' subsequent product preference in live streaming shopping. The authors conducted one field study and three lab experiments. Study 1 documents the positive correlation between PAP consumption and indulgent consumption using real live streaming transaction data. Study 2 is a lab experiment which provides support for the causal relationship between PAP consumption and subsequent indulgent consumption. Study 3 extends the ecological validity and examines the mediating effect of the moral self-concept. Study 4 demonstrates that discount levels of PAP weaken the moral licensing effect in the in live streaming shopping context.

psychology, multidisciplinary, experimental
The Fresh Start Effect: Temporal Landmarks Motivate Aspirational Behavior

Hengchen Dai,Katherine L. Milkman,Jason Riis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1901

IF: 5.4

2014-10-01

Management Science

Abstract:The popularity of New Year's resolutions suggests that people are more likely to tackle their goals immediately following salient temporal landmarks. If true, this little-researched phenomenon has the potential to help people overcome important willpower problems that often limit goal attainment. Across three archival field studies, we provide evidence of a “fresh start effect.” We show that Google searches for the term “diet” (Study 1), gym visits (Study 2), and commitments to pursue goals (Study 3) all increase following temporal landmarks (e.g., the outset of a new week, month, year, or semester; a birthday; a holiday). We propose that these landmarks demarcate the passage of time, creating many new mental accounting periods each year, which relegate past imperfections to a previous period, induce people to take a big-picture view of their lives, and thus motivate aspirational behaviors. Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1901 . This paper was accepted by Yuval Rottenstreich, judgment and decision making.

management,operations research & management science
Be a Rascal Among Rascal? The Vicarious Moral Self-Regulation Effect in College Students' Pro-Environmental Behaviors

Xiao Xiao,Youlong Zhan,Yiping Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S414341

2023-08-02

Abstract:Purpose: According to social interaction theory, the psychology and behavior of individuals are influenced by others, especially these significant or intimate others. This classical social phenomenon, "Be a rascal among rascal", which explains the influence of others' behavior on an individual's behavior, has also been observed in pro-environmental behavior. In recent years, environmental psychologists have termed this interesting phenomenon as the "vicarious moral self-regulation effect", in which the prior environmental behavior of significant or intimate others influences an individual's subsequent environmental behavior. However, the stability and psychological mechanisms of the vicarious moral self-regulation effect are still not well understood. Therefore, this study aims to verify the vicarious moral self-regulation effect in pro-environmental behavior through four studies. Methods and results: In Study 1, 90 participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups (a stronger green credentials manipulation, a weaker green credentials manipulation, or a control group about a close friend), and results showed that participants in both stronger and less green credential groups made fewer carbon-neutral choices than those in the control group in the carbon emissions task. In Study 2 (120 participants), compared to the control group, participants in the group imagining both environmentally friendly and unfriendly behavior of close friends made fewer carbon-neutral choices. This finding also was observed in Study 3 (93 participants), where participants under the group of free recalling both environmentally friendly and unfriendly behavior of close friends made fewer green purchasing choices. In Study 4 (75 participants), compared to the control group, participants in the group of both imagining and free recalling the environmentally friendly behavior of a close friend made fewer carbon-neutral choices, and participants in the group of both imagining and free recalling the environmentally unfriendly behavior of close friend made fewer green purchasing choices. Conclusion: Results suggest that the environmentally friendly behavior of a close friend induces the vicarious moral licensing effect (those who handle vermilion are not reddened), and the environmentally unfriendly behavior of a close friend induces the vicarious moral identity effect (those who touch ink are blackened). Environmental behaviors of intimate others induce the obvious fluctuating changes in college students' subsequent pro-environmental behaviors. This vicarious moral self-regulation effect can be explained by the mechanism of self-other overlap and provide scientific references for promoting pro-environmental behaviors among college students.
Socially Green Nudges: Unveiling the Power of Peer Influence on Green Choices

Zhenyu Gao,Yan Luo,Hao Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4731328

2024-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser Add Paper to My Library Share: Permalink Using these links will ensure access to this page indefinitely Copy URL Copy DOI
Short- and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior

Sun Joo (Grace) Ahn,Jeremy N. Bailenson,Dooyeon Park

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.025

IF: 9.9

2014-10-01

Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract:Immersive virtual environments (IVEs) allow individuals to see, hear, and feel digital stimuli as if they were in the physical world. Two studies tested the power of embodied experiences within IVEs by comparing the effects of cutting a virtual tree against reading a print description or watching a video depiction of the tree-cutting process to encourage paper conservation. Experiment 1 found that IVEs led participants to consume 20% less paper than participants who read a print description of tree cutting. Experiment 2 demonstrated that IVEs elicited greater self-reported internal environmental locus of control and self-reported environmental behaviors than print and video messages one week following the virtual experience. Moreover, internal environmental locus of control served as a mediator, driving environmental behaviors. We discuss the implications of using embodied experiences for behavior change.

psychology, multidisciplinary, experimental
More than resisting temptation: Beneficial habits mediate the relationship between self-control and positive life outcomes.

Brian M. Galla,Angela L. Duckworth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000026

IF: 8.46

2015-09-01

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract:Why does self-control predict such a wide array of positive life outcomes? Conventional wisdom holds that self-control is used to effortfully inhibit maladaptive impulses, yet this view conflicts with emerging evidence that self-control is associated with less inhibition in daily life. We propose that one of the reasons individuals with better self-control use less effortful inhibition, yet make better progress on their goals is that they rely on beneficial habits. Across 6 studies (total N = 2,274), we found support for this hypothesis. In Study 1, habits for eating healthy snacks, exercising, and getting consistent sleep mediated the effect of self-control on both increased automaticity and lower reported effortful inhibition in enacting those behaviors. In Studies 2 and 3, study habits mediated the effect of self-control on reduced motivational interference during a work-leisure conflict and on greater ability to study even under difficult circumstances. In Study 4, homework habits mediated the effect of self-control on classroom engagement and homework completion. Study 5 was a prospective longitudinal study of teenage youth who participated in a 5-day meditation retreat. Better self-control before the retreat predicted stronger meditation habits 3 months after the retreat, and habits mediated the effect of self-control on successfully accomplishing meditation practice goals. Finally, in Study 6, study habits mediated the effect of self-control on homework completion and 2 objectively measured long-term academic outcomes: grade point average and first-year college persistence. Collectively, these results suggest that beneficial habits-perhaps more so than effortful inhibition-are an important factor linking self-control with positive life outcomes.

psychology, social
Do Green Products Make Us Better People?

Nina Mazar,Chen-Bo Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363538

IF: 10.172

2010-03-05

Psychological Science

Abstract:Consumer choices reflect not only price and quality preferences but also social and moral values, as witnessed in the remarkable growth of the global market for organic and environmentally friendly products. Building on recent research on behavioral priming and moral regulation, we found that mere exposure to green products and the purchase of such products lead to markedly different behavioral consequences. In line with the halo associated with green consumerism, results showed that people act more altruistically after mere exposure to green products than after mere exposure to conventional products. However, people act less altruistically and are more likely to cheat and steal after purchasing green products than after purchasing conventional products. Together, our studies show that consumption is connected to social and ethical behaviors more broadly across domains than previously thought.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Obstacles to Ethical Decision-Making in the Perception of Ethical Context

Patricia H. Werhane,Laura P. Hartman,Crina Archer,Elaine Englehardt,Michael S. Pritchard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89797-4_21

2019-01-01

Abstract:In this essay Werhane et al expand a topic she first explored in “Why do good people do bad things” (2005). The suggestion here is that it may be easy to understand evil when it is done with deliberate intent, but it is harder to explain why good managers and companies with good reputations engage in questionable or aberrant behavior. Currently, for example, Volkswagen, a company that had an excellent reputation on the basis of fine engineering and managerial excellence, has pleaded guilty to an engineering scandal that involves lying and illegal reengineering of emissions software in their diesel cars. Were these – otherwise fine – engineers and their excellent managers simply blinded by company loyalty? Were they perhaps just following orders? Or were they genuinely interested in hoodwinking their customers and the public? Werhane mediates a discussion through such possibilities exploring the generally haphazard ways in which accidents of good judgement may arise.Original publication: This is excerpted and edited from Chapter 4 of Obstacles to Ethical Decision-Making: Mental Models, Milgram and the Problem of Obedience by Patricia Werhane, Laura P. Hartman, Crina Archer, Elaine E. Englehardt and Michael S. Prichard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013) pp. 63–89. Reprinted with permission.
Determinants of Justification and Self-Control.

Ran Kivetz,Yuhuang Zheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.572

2006-01-01

Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Abstract:The authors propose that people use 2 routes in justifying self-gratification: 1st through hard work or excellence (entitlement) and the 2nd through the attainment of vices without depleting income. This framework was tested using real tasks and choices adopted from prior research on self-control. The results indicate that (a) higher effort and (bogus) excellence feedback increase preferences for vice rewards, but these effects are reversed or attenuated when the interchangeability of effort and income is implied; (b) willingness to pay in effort is greater for vices than virtues, but willingness to pay in income is higher for virtues; and (c) these effects are magnified among individuals with stronger (chronic or manipulated) guilt. The authors discuss the ability of the justification routes to explain the findings of prior self-control research.
Improving Self-Control: The Influence of Role Models on Intertemporal Choices

Gayannée Kedia,Hilmar Brohmer,Marc Scholten,Katja Corcoran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01722

IF: 3.8

2019-08-02

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:The ability to delay rewards is one of the most useful qualities one may wish to develop. People who possess this quality achieve more successful careers, display better interpersonal skills and are less vulnerable to psychopathology, obesity or addictions. In the present online studies, we investigated the extent to which delay-of-reward behaviors in female participants can be improved by observing others mastering it. We developed an intertemporal choice (IC) paradigm in which participants had to make fictitious choices between sooner smaller rewards and later bigger ones (e.g., $150 in 1 week vs. $170 in 4 weeks). In Study 1 (N = 186), we found that participants who delayed more had higher socioeconomic statuses and were less likely to procrastinate, smoke or develop obesity. In Study 2 (N = 178), we exposed female participants to a role model who, faced with ICs, chose most of the time the delayed option. Results showed that, although participants were only asked to memorize the model's decisions, they tended to choose the delayed option more often after than before exposure to the model. In Study 3 (N = 148), we found that the direction of the influence depended on the model's behavior: our female participants delayed more after having seen a high delay than a low delay model. In Study 4 (N = 370), we confirmed the effect of modeling on ICs in comparison to a control condition and showed that this effect was still significant 3 months after exposure to the model. Altogether, these results speak in favor of a high efficacy of modeling to develop self-control in women.

psychology, multidisciplinary
When Seeking the Best Brings out the Worst in Consumers: Understanding the Relationship Between a Maximizing Mindset and Immoral Behavior

Kelly Goldsmith,Caroline Roux,Jingjing Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1017

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Consumers often adopt a goal to choose “the best” option: be it the best value for their money, the product with the highest quality, or the product that offers the best match to their idiosyncratic preferences. Prior work has characterized this orientation as a “maximizing mindset,” and has demonstrated that the adoption of a maximizing mindset can lead to both positive and negative consequences for the self. However, to date, little is known about if a maximizing mindset might have consequences beyond the self (i.e., for others and/or society). The current article addresses this gap by demonstrating that consumers who adopt a maximizing mindset (vs. a neutral mindset) are subsequently more likely to engage in immoral behaviors. Further, we demonstrate that this effect occurs because a maximizing mindset activates cognitions related to scarcity. In doing so, the current research offers a more nuanced understanding of the psychological and behavioral consequences of a maximizing mindset, and identifies a maximizing mindset as an antecedent to cognitions related to scarcity and immoral behaviors.
The Effect of Income and Wealth on Behavioral Strategies, Personality Traits, and Preferences

Mélusine Boon-Falleur,Nicolas Baumard,Jean-Baptiste André

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231201512

2024-01-25

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract:Perspectives on Psychological Science, Ahead of Print. Individuals living in either harsh or favorable environments display well-documented psychological and behavioral differences. For example, people in favorable environments tend to be more future-oriented, trust strangers more, and have more explorative preferences. To account for such differences, psychologists have turned to evolutionary biology and behavioral ecology, in particular, the literature on life-history theory and pace-of-life syndrome. However, critics have found that the theoretical foundations of these approaches are fragile and that differences in life expectancy cannot explain vast psychological and behavioral differences. In this article, we build on the theory of optimal resource allocation to propose an alternative framework. We hypothesize that the quantity of resources available, such as income, has downstream consequences on psychological traits, leading to the emergence of behavioral syndromes. We show that more resources lead to more long-term orientation, more tolerance of variance, and more investment in low marginal-benefit needs. At the behavioral level, this translates, among others, into more large-scale cooperation, more investment in health, and more exploration. These individual-level differences in behavior, in turn, account for cultural phenomena such as puritanism, authoritarianism, and innovation.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: the Link Between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance

Zhenglin Zhang,Haiqing Shi,Taiwen Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215284

2022-01-01

Abstract:Despite the significance of pro-environmental behavior (PEB) in the workplace, most of the existing studies have neglected its negative work outcomes. Drawing upon moral licensing theory and cognitive dissonance theory, we construct a conceptual model of the influence mechanism of employees’ PEB (i.e., public-sphere PEB, private-sphere PEB) on workplace deviance through psychological entitlement, and the moderating effect of rationalization of workplace deviance on the relationship between psychological entitlement and workplace deviance. Using two-stage survey data from 216 employees in China, we performed hierarchical regression analysis and structural equation modeling method to test our hypotheses. Our findings reveal that public-sphere PEB positively affects psychological entitlement, while private-sphere PEB negatively affects psychological entitlement. Psychological entitlement further positively affects workplace deviance. In addition, rationalization of workplace deviance strengthens the positive impact of psychological entitlement on workplace deviance. This study offers novel insights into the dark side of PEB literature by exploring the PEB–workplace deviance relationship. This study also contributes to managerial implications of how PEB leads to workplace deviance and how to address this issue.

The Good-on-Paper Effect: How the Decision Context Influences Virtuous Behavior

Diverging Effects of Clean Versus Dirty Money on Attitudes, Values, and Interpersonal Behavior.

Green is the New White: How Virtue Motivates Green Product Purchase

Is Money Worth Saving? Money Anthropomorphism Increases Saving Behavior

Mindset Switching Increases the Use of 'Want-Based' over 'Should-Based' Behaviors

Doing good vs. avoiding bad in prosocial choice: A refined test and extension of the morality preference hypothesis

The benefit of virtue signaling: Corporate sleight-of-hand positively influences consumers' judgments about "social license to operate"

The Effect of Preceding Self-Control on Green Consumption Behavior: the Moderating Role of Moral Elevation.

Doing well by doing good: The effect of purchasing poverty-alleviation products on consumers' subsequent product preference in live streaming shopping

The Fresh Start Effect: Temporal Landmarks Motivate Aspirational Behavior

Be a Rascal Among Rascal? The Vicarious Moral Self-Regulation Effect in College Students' Pro-Environmental Behaviors

Socially Green Nudges: Unveiling the Power of Peer Influence on Green Choices

Short- and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior

More than resisting temptation: Beneficial habits mediate the relationship between self-control and positive life outcomes.

Do Green Products Make Us Better People?

Obstacles to Ethical Decision-Making in the Perception of Ethical Context

Determinants of Justification and Self-Control.

Improving Self-Control: The Influence of Role Models on Intertemporal Choices

When Seeking the Best Brings out the Worst in Consumers: Understanding the Relationship Between a Maximizing Mindset and Immoral Behavior

The Effect of Income and Wealth on Behavioral Strategies, Personality Traits, and Preferences

Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: the Link Between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance