Abstract:Problem definition: In a multistage model of a bilateral supply chain, we study two postponement strategies that the downstream retailer may adopt to mitigate the supply yield risk originating from the upstream production process. The retailer could either postpone the procurement payment until after the yield is realized and pay only for the delivered amount; postpone the pricing decision to better utilize the available supply; or do both. Although both strategies have been separately studied in literature, there is little research on their combined effect and system-wide implications in a decentralized setting. Methodology/results: Taking a game-theoretic approach, we formulate a Stackelberg game and solve for the equilibrium in four scenarios, respectively, in which the retailer uses different combinations of the postponement strategies. There are three main findings. First, when the production cost is low and the yield loss is highly likely, the retailer never strictly benefits from either postponement strategy; with relatively high production cost, the retailer is more likely to adopt payment, rather than pricing, postponement. Second, we uncover a situation where postponing payment and postponing pricing are strategic complements for the retailer. That is, the use of one strategy may increase the benefit of using the other. Third, we identify conditions under which the postponement strategies can be Pareto optimal to the entire supply chain, making the firms’ profits and the consumer surplus simultaneously higher. Managerial implications: These results can be applied in many practical settings to provide guidance for firms to better design the procurement contract and properly use marketing instrument (pricing) to effectively mitigate supply risk and increase profit. Funding: G. Xiao acknowledges financial support from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [General Research Fund Grant PolyU 15503920]. X. Guo acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72293564/72293560]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0198 .

Mitigating Supply Risk with Limited Information: Emergency Supply and Responsive Pricing

Supply diversification under random yield: The impact of price postponement

Mitigating Supply Disruption: the Interplay Between Responsive Pricing and Information Sharing under Dual Sourcing

Using Backup Supply with Responsive Pricing to Mitigate Disruption Risk for a Risk-Averse Firm.

Mitigating Supply Uncertainty: the Interplay Between Diversification and Pricing

Impact of Supply Risks on Procurement Decisions

Mitigating Supply Risk: an Approach with Quantity Flexibility Procurement

Random Yield And Coordination Mechanisms Of A Supply Chain With Emergency Backup Sourcing

Optimizing Emergency Supply Pre-Positioning for Disaster Relief: A Two-Stage Distributionally Robust Approach

Managing Supply Disruption Through Procurement Strategy and Price Competition

Supply Risk Mitigation in a Decentralized Supply Chain: Pricing Postponement or Payment Postponement?

Optimizing Emergency Supply Pre-Positioning for Disaster Relief

Strategic cooperation with a backup supplier for the mitigation of supply disruptions

Managing Emergency Procurement Using Option Contract under Supply Disruption and Demand Uncertainty

Analysis on Supply Emergency Management Based on Dual-Source

Optimal procurement strategies from suppliers with random yield and all-or-nothing risks

On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks

Supply chain coordination with random yield and demand uncertainty

Consignment Contract in a Supply Chain with Price, Demand and Yield Randomness: A Distributionally Robust Approach

Quantity Flexible Procurement Strategy Under Random Yield

Random Yield, Forward Market and Price Formation