Abstract:Microseismic monitoring system is one of the effective means to monitor ground stress in deep mines. The accuracy and speed of microseismic signal identification directly affect the stability analysis in rock engineering. At present, manual identification, which heavily relies on manual experience, is widely used to classify microseismic events and blasts in the mines. To realize intelligent and accurate identification of microseismic events and blasts, a microseismic signal identification system based on machine learning was established in this work. The discrimination of microseismic events and blasts was established based on the machine learning framework. The microseismic monitoring data was used to optimize the parameters and validate the classification methods. Subsequently, ten machine learning algorithms were used as the preliminary algorithms of the learning layer, including the Decision Tree, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, SVM, KNN, GBDT, Naive Bayes, Bagging, AdaBoost, and MLP. Then, training set and test set, accounting for 50% of each data set, were prospectively examined, and the ACC, PPV, SEN, NPV, SPE, FAR and ROC curves were used as evaluation indexes. Finally, the performances of these machine learning algorithms in microseismic signal identification were evaluated with cross-validation methods. The results showed that the Logistic Regression classifier had the best performance in parameter identification, and the accuracy of cross-validation can reach more than 0.95. Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Naive Bayes also performed well in this data set. There were some differences in the accuracy of different classifiers in the training set, test set, and all data sets. To improve the accuracy of signal identification, the database of microseismic events and blasts should be expanded, to avoid the inaccurate data distribution caused by the small training set. Artificial intelligence identification methods, including Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and AdaBoost algorithms, were applied to signal identification of the microseismic monitoring system in mines, and the identification results were consistent with the actual situation. In this way, the confusion caused by manual classification between microseismic events and blasts based on the characteristics of waveform signals is solved, and the required source parameters are easily obtained, which can ensure the accuracy and timeliness of microseismic events and blasts identification.

Classification of Clustered Microseismic Events in a Coal Mine Using Machine Learning

Prediction Method for Mine Earthquake in Time Sequence Based on Clustering Analysis

Improved Mine Microseismic Event Recognition Method Combining Neural Network and Transfer Learning.

A novel identification method of microseismic events based on empirical mode decomposition and artificial neural network features

Microseismic Source Location Using Deep Learning: A Coal Mine Case Study in China

Machine Learning Based Identification of Microseismic Signals Using Characteristic Parameters

Quality control of microseismic P-phase arrival picks in coal mine based on machine learning

Research on Automatic Classification of Coal Mine Microseismic Events Based on Data Enhancement and FCN-LSTM Network

Application of a convolutional neural network for seismic phase picking of mining-induced seismicity

A Deep Learning-Based Data-Driven Approach for Predicting Mining Water Inrush from Coal Seam Floor Using Microseismic Monitoring Data

Identifying Microseismic Events in a Mining Scenario Using a Convolutional Neural Network

Detection and Monitoring of Mining-Induced Seismicity Based on Machine Learning and Template Matching: A Case Study from Dongchuan Copper Mine, China

LGF SeismoLocator: A Deep Learning Model for Precision Microseismic Event Localization in Coal Mines

Study on Deep Learning Methods for Coal Burst Risk Prediction Based on Mining-Induced Seismicity Quantification

Automatic Classification of Microseismic Signals Based on MFCC and GMM-HMM in Underground Mines

Discrimination of Mining Microseismic Events and Blasts Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Original Waveform

Microseismic records classification using capsule network with limited training samples in underground mining

Micro-seismic Event Detection and Location in Underground Mines by Using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Deep Learning

Using machine learning approach for microseismic events recognition in underground excavations: Comparison of ten frequently-used models

A Hybrid Recognition Model of Microseismic Signals for Underground Mining Based on CNN and LSTM Networks

Characteristics and Classification of Microseismic Signals in Heading Face of Coal Mine: Implication for Coal and Gas Outburst Warning