Inadvertent Malposition of a Permanent Ventricular Lead into the Middle Cardiac Vein Was Misdiagnosed As Lead Perforation

Mingxian Chen,Zhihong Wu,Zhenjiang Liu,Lin Hu,Xuping Li,Qiming Liu,Shenghua Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12949
IF: 1.485
2022-01-01
Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
Abstract:A 54‐year‐old man had a dual‐chamber pacemaker implantation 9 years ago because of sick sinus syndrome at a different facility. The patient did not undergo any evaluation of his pacemaker for a long time with cardiologist. The patient was admitted to another hospital manifesting dyspnea and palpitation with atrial fibrillation for 1 month, and he was diagnosed with ventricular lead perforation. For further treatment, he was referred to our hospital, and an elective replacement indicator (ERI) of the battery state and a malpositioned ventricular lead into the middle cardiac vein were found. Finally, the pacing lead was left in the primary place and the pacemaker was replaced.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?