Abstract:Background and Aims: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the first line therapy in the investigation of and treatment for UGIH. The ability to predict the need for therapeutic endoscopy (TE) may streamline hospital resource utilization, save costs and select low risk patients for outpatient management. There is little data and no risk scores available to date to predict this outcome. This study aims to derive and validate a risk score for predicting the need for TE in non-cirrhotic patients with UGIH. Methods: We prospectively collected clinical and laboratory variables on 1013 non-cirrhotic patients, who presented with hematemesis, melena, coffee ground vomiting or hematochezia between January 2006 and March 2007. Univariate analyses were performed on the variables and a risk score was derived using logistic regression. This risk score was then prospectively validated in a separate cohort of non-cirrhotic patients with UGIH. We compared the accuracy of this score with the Blatchford score in the validation cohort using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Of the 1013 patients, 252 (24.9%) required TE for haemostasis according to international consensus guidelines, of which 81% were for peptic ulcers. The presence of shock (SBP<100 mmHg), tachycardia (HR>100 bpm), low hemoglobin (<8 g/dL) and high urea were independently associated with the need for TE (all p<0.001). Hematemesis was a stronger predictor for TE when compared to melaena. The use of H2-receptor blockers and proton pump inhibitors was protective against this need (p=0.02). Age, co-morbidities and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin played no role. The area under a ROC curve for the new risk score in the validation cohort of 337 non-cirrhotic patients was 0.71 (95% CI 0.66-0.77). A threshold of 3 or above predicted the need for TE with 100% sensitivity and 17% specificity, and identified 12.5% of patients as low risk. The area under a ROC curve for the Blatchford score applied to the same cohort was 0.66 (95% CI 0.60-0.73); this identified 2.7% of patients as low risk. There was a significant difference between the 2 areas (p=0.04). Conclusion Hemodynamics, urea and hemoglobin continue to be important predictors of the need for TE; acid suppressive agents play a protective role. Age, co-morbidities and the use of NSAIDs and aspirin do not appear to influence this risk. Risk scores predicting the need for TE perform better at identifying low risk patients. Compared to the Blatchford score, our new risk score identifies more low risk patients who may be suitable for outpatient management.

BEST-J Score: Validation of a Predicting Model for Delayed Bleeding After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection on a European Sample

Validation of the BEST-J score, a prediction model for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective observational study

Prediction model of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: BEST-J score

A risk prediction model for delayed bleeding after ESD for gastric precancerous lesions

Aspiration and Coagulation to Reduce Risk of Delayed Bleeding after Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (with Video).

Establishing a nomogram for predicting the risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors

Prediction of the need for emergency endoscopic treatment for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and new score model: a retrospective study

Risk-Scoring System for Prediction of Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Requiring Additional Gastrectomy in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer

Analysis of Risk Factors and Development of Scoring System to Predict Severity of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Children

Evaluation of intraoperative bleeding grading and related factors of ESD treatment for early gastric cancer

S993 A Novel Model for Predicting the Need of Endoscopic Intervention in Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

A New Scoring System to Predict Poor Clinical Outcomes in Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients with High-Risk Stigmata

Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study

Risk Prediction of Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Coagulation Syndrome

S1005 A Score Based on Clinical Factors Predicts Endoscopically Significant Lesions in Critically Ill Patients With Upper GI Bleeding

Predicting procedure duration of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection at Western endoscopy centers

Prediction of the Need for Endoscopic Hemostasis in Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage (ugih): A Risk Score Derivation and Validation Study

Prediction of technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial colorectal tumors: a novel clinical score model

Follow-up Value of Endoscopy for Delayed Postoperative Bleeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissec-Tion

Validation and update of clinical score model to predict technical difficulty of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A multicenter prospective cohort study

Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model Compared With Clinical Risk Scores for Gastrointestinal Bleeding