Abstract:Imaging flow cytometry (IFC) produces up to 12 spectrally distinct, information-rich images of single cells at a throughput of 5,000 cells per second. Yet often, cell populations are still studied using manual gating, a technique that has several drawbacks, hence it would be advantageous to replace manual gating with an automated process. Ideally, this automated process would be based on stain-free measurements, as the currently used staining techniques are expensive and potentially confounding. These stain-free measurements originate from the brightfield and darkfield image channels, which capture transmitted and scattered light, respectively. To realize this automated, stain-free approach, advanced machine learning (ML) methods are required. Previous works have successfully tested this approach on cell cycle phase classification with both a classical ML approach based on manually engineered features, and a deep learning (DL) approach. In this work, we compare both approaches extensively on the problem of white blood cell classification. Four human whole blood samples were assayed on an ImageStream-X MK II imaging flow cytometer. Two samples were stained for the identification of eight white blood cell types, while two other sample sets were stained for the identification of resting and active eosinophils. For both data sets, four ML classifiers were evaluated on stain-free imagery with stratified 5-fold cross-validation. On the white blood cell data set, the best obtained results were 0.778 and 0.703 balanced accuracy for classical ML and DL, respectively. On the eosinophil data set, this was 0.871 and 0.856 balanced accuracy. We conclude that classifying cell types based on only stain-free images is possible with all four classifiers. Noteworthy, we also find that the DL approaches tested in this work do not outperform the approaches based on manually engineered features. © 2019 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Rapid and Label-Free Classification of Blood Leukocytes for Immune State Monitoring

Deep-Learning Based Label-Free Classification of Activated and Inactivated Neutrophils for Rapid Immune State Monitoring

Label-Free White Blood Cell Classification Using Refractive Index Tomography and Deep Learning

Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning

Label-free white blood cells classification using a deep feature fusion neural network

A rapid white blood cell classification system based on multimode imaging technology

Accurate label-free 3-part leukocyte recognition with single cell lens-free imaging flow cytometry

AI-Based Portable White Blood Cells Classification and Counting System in POCT

Three-part differential of unlabeled leukocytes with a compact lens-free imaging flow cytometer

Optofluidic device for label-free cell classification from whole blood

High-Efficiency Classification of White Blood Cells Based on Object Detection

Label-free hematology analysis method based on defocusing phase-contrast imaging under illumination of 415 nm light

A microfluidic cytometer for white blood cell analysis

Artificial intelligence-based classification of peripheral blood nucleated cells using label-free imaging flow cytometry

Automatic whole blood cell analysis from blood smear using label-free multi-modal imaging with deep neural networks

Classification of Human White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning for Stain-Free Imaging Flow Cytometry

Label-Free CD34+ Cell Identification Using Deep Learning and Lens-Free Shadow Imaging Technology

Multiparameter mobile blood analysis for complete blood count using contrast-enhanced defocusing imaging and machine vision

White blood cell detection, classification and analysis using phase imaging with computational specificity (PICS)

Label Free Identification of Peripheral Blood Eosinophils Using High-Throughput Imaging Flow Cytometry

Deep Learning-assisted Smartphone-based Quantitative Microscopy for Label-free Peripheral Blood Smear Analysis