Abstract:Abstract Background Performing basic hematology analysis in a near-patient setting enables more rapid clinical decision making in the process of diagnosis. Traditional blood analyzers in central labs use a complex combination of sensing principles and chemical modification of the sample to derive the necessary parameters for a complete blood count (CBC). To reduce cost and maintenance, varying approaches have been employed to determine a CBC with a single-step measurement technique. One common option is the use of optical microscopy to deliver highly reliable results, examples are fluorescence microscopy, digital holographic microscopy, or spatial light interference microscopy. However, most of these technologies lack a proper determination of cellular-level RBC parameters. Therefore, a non-interferometric, quantitative-phase measurement technique was developed to derive relevant CBC parameters from a single measurement, comparable to a standard lab analyzer. Methods The optical setup employed by this method enables the parallel acquisition of brightfield and differential interference contrast (DIC) images by polarization-sensitive cameras. By using three cameras with individual optical filters, quantitative phase and absorption information can be calculated, which enables the determination of mean cellular volume (MCV), mean cellular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean cellular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) for red blood cells (RBCs). The whole-blood sample is diluted in a buffer containing a non-cell-penetrating dye to enhance optical refraction contrast and therefore precision in the dependent calculated quantities. The sample is then introduced to a glass flow cell, and the cells are allowed to sediment to the bottom for imaging. Machine learning is applied to the derived images to classify unstained native white blood cells (WBCs) to yield a 5-part differential, which distinguishes between neutrophil, monocyte, lymphocyte, eosinophil and basophil. The algorithm is trained by imaging FACS-validated, purified WBC subgroups. All blood samples are measured on an ADVIA® 2120 Hematology System for control. Results A one-step, optical CBC hematology system based on quantitative phase and absorption image analysis was developed. The correlations for MCV and MCHC compared to a standard lab CBC analyzer were 0.77 and 0.84. The accuracy for the 5-part differential WBC classification was approximately 0.8. To enable a visual inspection of the classification results, a pseudo-colored image of each cell was generated and uploaded in a review tool. Conclusion With a more-refined, less-expensive optical setup, a high-quality CBC analyzer suitable for use at the point of care can be derived with the presented method. A possible simplification could be the use of low-cost but high-resolution Fourier ptychography microscopy (FPM) technology. Imaging of blood samples on a single-cell level offers the potential for the analysis of even more morphological parameters, for example, disease-related changes in the cell membrane. Also, the adhesion behavior of the WBCs in the glass flow cell could indicate cell activation status and therefore give information about infection processes. *Trademark disclaimer: “ADVIA, and all associated marks are trademarks of Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.”

Three-part differential of unlabeled leukocytes with a compact lens-free imaging flow cytometer

Accurate label-free 3-part leukocyte recognition with single cell lens-free imaging flow cytometry

Lensless On-Chip Chemiluminescence Imaging for High-Throughput Single-Cell Heterogeneity Analysis.

Label-free hematology analysis method based on defocusing phase-contrast imaging under illumination of 415 nm light

Leukocyte Differential Based on an Imaging and Impedance Flow Cytometry of Microfluidics Coupled with Deep Neural Networks

Field-Portable Leukocyte Classification Device Based on Lens-Free Shadow Imaging Technique

Multiparameter mobile blood analysis for complete blood count using contrast-enhanced defocusing imaging and machine vision

A microfluidic cytometer for white blood cell analysis

Rapid and Label-Free Classification of Blood Leukocytes for Immune State Monitoring

A-144 Three-wavelength Polarization Imaging Method for the Analysis of Individual Human Blood Cells With Dye-Enhanced Dispersion of Dilution Buffer

Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning

Ultra High-Throughput Multiparametric Imaging Flow Cytometry: Towards Diffraction-Limited Sub-Cellular Detection

On-chip flow cytometer using integrated photonics for the detection of human leukocytes

Deep Learning-assisted Smartphone-based Quantitative Microscopy for Label-free Peripheral Blood Smear Analysis

Optofluidic device for label-free cell classification from whole blood

Label Free Identification of Peripheral Blood Eosinophils Using High-Throughput Imaging Flow Cytometry

Handheld Microflow Cytometer Based on a Motorized Smart Pipette, a Microfluidic Cell Concentrator, and a Miniaturized Fluorescence Microscope

Portable platform for leukocyte extraction from blood using sheath-free microfluidic DLD

Computational Imaging Of Label-Free Cells Using Lens-Less Digital Holography

Computational Cytometer Based on Magnetically Modulated Coherent Imaging and Deep Learning

Light-field flow cytometry for high-resolution, volumetric and multiparametric 3D single-cell analysis