Treatment Outcomes of Regenerative Endodontic Procedures in Traumatized Immature Permanent Necrotic Teeth: A Retrospective Study

Jing Cheng,Fengjiao Yang,Jiahui Li,Fang Hua,Miao He,Guangtai Song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2022.03.015
IF: 4.422
2022-01-01
Journal of Endodontics
Abstract:Introduction: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) for traumatic immature permanent teeth. Meanwhile, predictors influencing treatment outcomes were also analyzed to provide evidence for the management of immature teeth after different traumatic scenarios. Methods: Traumatized immature permanent teeth diagnosed with pulp necrosis treated by REPs using blood clot or concentrated growth factor scaffolds with at least 6 months of follow-up were included from 2012 to 2021. Treatment outcomes were categorized as a success or failure and survival. Further root development was assessed in terms of the per-centage changes in the apical diameter, root length, and radiographic root area. Among different injury types, the clinical and radiographic outcomes of REPs were evaluated by the Fisher exact test and the Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively. Survival analysis and Cox regres-sion analysis were performed to identify significant predictors affecting outcomes. Results: Sixty-two teeth with a mean of 22.3 months of follow-up satisfied the criteria, and 80.6% of the teeth had a successful outcome. A significant change was observed in a decrease of the apical diameter (69.3%) and an increase of the radiographic root area (22.6%) after REPs. Among different injury types, the success rates of REPs were as follows: fracture, 84.6%; luxation, 83.3%; combined injuries, 78.6%; and avulsion, 33.3% (P . .05). Fractured teeth had a significantly greater decrease of the apical diameter than combined injuries (P < .05). Avulsion was more prone to developing root resorption than fracture (P < .05). Scaffold was a significant predictor for success; a blood clot had a significantly reduced risk for failure than concentrated growth factor (hazard ratio 5 16; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-125.2; P < .001). Conclusions: REPs provided satisfactory outcomes in traumatized immature permanent necrotic teeth. However, severe injuries, especially avulsion, should be determined carefully to perform REPs when resorption is expected. Scaffold selection may be an important consideration. (J Endod 2022;48:1129-1136.)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?