Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Reliability and Validity Analysis of the Chinese Version of Evaluation of Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (Easi-Qol).

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire for the Spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S)

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents

[Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31-P)].

Translation and reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-Specific Quality of Life-Short Form

The Chinese Language Version of the Abbreviated Burn Specific Health Scale: a Validation Study.

Reliability And Validity Of The Simplified Chinese Early-Onset Scoliosis Quality Of Life 24-Item Questionnaire

Chinese validation of the quality of life profile for spinal deformities (QLPSD).

Reliability and Validity of Chinese version Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form

A validation study on the traditional Chinese version of Spinal Appearance Questionnaire for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Chinese Version of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Transcultural Adaptation and Reliability Analysis

Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Adolescent Asthma Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Elderly-Constipation Impact Scale: a translation and validation study

Validity of LupusQoL-China for the Assessment of Health Related Quality of Life in Chinese Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Chronic Heart Failure Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (CHFQOLQ-20)

Development and testing of the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire

Development and validation of the rheumatoid arthritis scale among the system of quality of life instruments for chronic diseases QLICD-RA (V2.0)

Development of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties evaluation

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22(Srs-22)patient Questionnaire