Reliability and Validity of Chinese version Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form

Yan Hu
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objectives:To exam the reliability and validity of Chinese version Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form (CARES-SF). Methods:The WHO-QOL methodology of cross-culture adaptation for quality of life was used to evaluate CARES-SF Chinese version. 146 cancer patients completed CARES-SF initially (Time 1), 107 completed the follow-up investigation 6 months later (Time 2). Results:The test-retest reliability of CARES-SF Chinese version was 0.81, Cronbach alpha for internal consistency ranged from 0.66-0.93. CARES-SF scores were significantly related to symptom distress, anxiety, and depression measures (r=0.46, 0.43, 0.49 respectively, P0.01). The construct validity was also confirmed by factor analysis, with 66.82% variance was explained by 9 factors. The CARES-SF has also been shown to discriminate quality of life scores between patients according to cancer site, and to be sensitive to changes in quality of life over 6 months.Conclusion: An acceptable psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CARES-SF is indicated. It can be used in quality of life measure for Chinese cancer patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?