Affective Valence Moderates the Influence of Thinking Style on Insight Problem Solving: Electrophysiological Evidence.

Xinyi Li,Yadan Li,Xuewei Wang,Huizhi Bai,Weiping Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108317
IF: 3.111
2022-01-01
Biological Psychology
Abstract:The present study examined whether affective valence moderated the influence of holistic and analytic thinking styles on insight problem solving by analysing event-related potentials (ERPs). Adult participants were screened and assigned to holistic-thinking and analytic-thinking groups, 22 participants per group. They completed the insight task. The results indicated that in the initial stage of insight, the positive affect elicited larger N1 am-plitudes than the negative affect in the analytic-thinking group. Moreover, for the holistic-thinking group, positive affect elicited larger P2 amplitudes than negative affect. In the subsequent stages, negative affect elicited larger N300-500 and late components than positive affect in the holistic-thinking group. In contrast, positive affect elicited larger N300-500 and late components than negative affect in the analytic-thinking group. These findings suggest that holistic-thinking individuals with negative affect and analytic-thinking individuals with positive affect were more able to abandon mental sets and reconstruct novel mental representations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?