What is Historical Political Science?

Yang Guangbin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-021-00204-2

2022-01-01

Chinese Political Science Review

Abstract:Political scientists from China as well as overseas are pursuing a new political approach since the globally prevalent perspective of political science based on the hypothesis of rational man seems unable to elucidate or resolve the issues of Western as well as non-Western countries anymore, let alone the political development of China. In the history of political science as a discipline, the multiple traditions that were developed, all essentially entail the political theories cultivated through the history and culture of the researchers’ own country. Hence, almost all the political and social theories that developed lie within the range of historical political science. The inherent characteristics of Chinese history in terms of being a political and national history imply that history itself is brimming with a variety of political theories. Historical ontology remains to be the principal keyword of historical political science. It seeks to explore how the varying historical aspects of each country tend to influence their political values, institutions, and conduct while also clearly defining the correlation between current politics and political history. Epistemologically speaking, history-based political theories typically comprise of local attributes. Historical political science connects Chinese and world history to political science, as well as the history of political ideologies to comparative political science, signifying an intersection and origin of neoteric knowledge in political science. The fundamental difference between historical political science and historical sociology tends to be that the former is essentially based on political history while the latter is on social history. Moreover, historical political science not only contributes greatly to the role of historical sociology in discovering and testing new theories, but also holds a political value that historical sociology lacks, namely the functional dimension of the social science.