Abstract:Due to a rapid economic growth over the past several decades China has significantly strengthened its international positions. This growth in its own turn was to a large extent due to a pragmatic and sound foreign strategy that the country has been pursuing since mid-1970s. However, in recent years both within and outside China there has been an on-going debate on the alleged radical transformation of the PRC’s perceptions of its national interests, its place in world politics, and its foreign policy. The variety of opinions becomes increasingly complicated as the number of discussants grows and new arguments are adduced in support of different positions. Whereas outside China this debate structures around the narrative of the Chinese assertiveness, within the country the main dispute is between the advocates of a traditional policy of ‘keeping a low profile’ (taoguang yanghui) and proponents of a new ‘striving for achievements’ (fenfa youwei) strategy. The present paper aims to provide a framework for a systematization of debates on the contemporary foreign policy of China in the English language academic literature based on two criteria: whether a researcher admits that the Chinese foreign policy is changing and how he assesses implications of these changes. Such an approach undoubtedly entails certain schematization of the presented views and arguments. However, it differs favorably from traditional, more narrative approaches to conceptualization of the debate since it establishes a clear, transparent theoretical framework aimed to identify the substantive core of the presented views. This, in turn, can bring about a better understanding of the current state and possible evolution of Chinese foreign policy in general. The author concludes that although these debates are far from being over, most researchers admit the PRC’s foreign policy strategy is undergoing a radical transformation. Since the latter half of 2000s there has been a steady trend in the foreign policy of China towards greater assertiveness. At the same time this transformation ensures continuity of the basic principles of Chinese diplomacy. All this means that further debates on the Chinese foreign policy should focus primarily on potential implications of this transformation for the PRC, the regional dynamics and international relations system as a whole.

With the Rise of China, What'S New for Comparative Politics?

Political Science and Chinese Political Studies—Where Is Chinese Political Science Headed?

Review Essay: How to Merge Western Theories and Chinese Indigenous Theories to Study Chinese Politics?

The Study of Chinese Politics: Toward a Third Generation of Scholarship

Self-reflection on Development of Political Studies and Construction of China's Political Studies

New Agenda for the Study of Chinese Governance

The State of the Field: Political Science and Chinese Political Studies

Telling Our Own Story: A Bibliometrics Analysis of Mainland China’s Influence on Chinese Politics Research, 2001–2020

China Studies:Its International Perspectives and Indigenous Significances

The State of the Field of Chinese Political Science: “glocalising” Political Science in China?

What about the dragon in the room? Incorporating China into international political economy (IPE) teaching

China Studies:Possible stands and paradigm reconstruction

Logic Transformation in Research of Political Science in China

Debates on Changes in the Foreign Policy of Contemporary China (A Case Study of the English Language Academic Publications)

Comparative Political Studies in Contemporary China:Defects and Possible Breakthroughs

Thirty Years of Political Science in China: from Learning from the West to Indigenization

Getting China’s Political Economy Right: State, Business, and Authoritarian Capitalism

The Cultural Sociology of China: Trajectory and Dynamics of a Burgeoning Field

New Political Sociology:Paradigm shift or theoretical complement?

Evolving Bureaucratic Politics in Chinese Foreign Policy-Making

The New Resource Politics: Can Australia And South Africa Accommodate China?