Abstract:Research Summary By integrating performance feedback theory and ownership management literature, we examine how parent multinational companies (MNCs) evaluate their foreign subsidiaries' poor performance against various aspirations and make multifaceted ownership change decisions. Our results show that social aspirations matter more than historical aspirations in ownership change decisions. When a focal subsidiary is underperforming relative to industry peers or overseas subsidiary peers, its parent MNC tends to change its ownership of foreign subsidiaries and by a high degree. However, regarding the direction of ownership change, a foreign subsidiary with performance below industry peers tends to experience an ownership decrease, whereas the opposite is true when a subsidiary's performance is below overseas subsidiary peers. Overall, we extend existing theories that downplay the role of aspirations in ownership changes. Managerial Summary Effective ownership management in foreign subsidiaries is key to sustaining the global operations of MNCs. An important task for parent managers is to make sense of the poor performance of their foreign subsidiaries against various aspirations and respond in terms of ownership change decisions. We find that managers are more sensitive when their foreign subsidiary's performance is below its social peers than below its past performance. Specifically, parent managers tend to change ownership to a large extent when their foreign subsidiary is poorly performed compared with its industry peers as an external benchmark or overseas subsidiary peers as an internal benchmark. Moreover, parent managers tend to reduce ownership when the subsidiary's performance is below industry peers, while are more likely to increase ownership when the performance is below its overseas subsidiary peers.

Performance Feedback and Firms' Relative Strategic Emphasis: the Moderating Effects of Board Independence and Media Coverage

Do Venture Capitalists Play A Monitoring Role in an Emerging Market? Evidence from the Pay-Performance Relationship of Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms

Do Good Firms Necessarily Do Bad Things? Performance Aspiration, Ownership and Financial Fraud

The Impact of Performance Feedback on Corporate Social Responsibility——Based on the Stakeholder Perspective,PAN Xiaoqing

Performance feedback on sales growth and M&A: Evidence from China

Stock Return or Sales Growth? Multiple Performance Feedback and Strategic Investments Under Securities Analysts’ Earnings Pressure

Social Performance Feedback and Firm Communication Strategy

Performance feedback and enterprise digital transformation

Firm performance feedback and organizational impression management: The moderating role of CEO overconfidence

Performance Evaluation Mechanism and CEO Turnover——Evidence Based on Different Ultimate Ownership in China's Lasted Firms

The impact of performance feedback on corporate ESG performance: Mediating role of environmental strategy

CEO duality and firm performance: A systematic review and research agenda

Performance Feedback Persistence: Comparative Effects of Historical Versus Peer Performance Feedback on Innovative Search

The Multifaceted Ownership Change of Foreign Subsidiaries: the Diverse Responses to Different Types of Negative Performance Feedback

An Empirical Analysis on the Structure of Board of Director and the Performance Evaluation of Listed Companies of Electronic Information Industry in China

Biased interpretation of performance feedback: The role of CEO overconfidence

Board Independence, Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance - Chinese Evidence

Reporting Only the Good News but Not the Bad? Mechanism of Negative Performance Feedback

Board Structure, Political Influence and Firm Performance - an Empirical Study on Publicly Listed Firms in China

Do CEO overconfidence and demographic characteristics moderate the effect of R&D investment on firm performance?

Does Independence of the Board Affect Firm Performance?