Management Earnings Forecasts and Financial Distress by Credit Ratings
Chi Keung Man
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3003898
2013-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Many prior works have already investigated what are sagacious managers’ incentives engaging opportunistic management forecasts disclosures such as managerial job security at risk (Brochet, F., Faurel, L., McVay, S., 2011), corporations likely wounded up and bankruptcies, the increasing probability of anti-takeover by outsiders (Morck et al., 1990; Brennan, 1999), executive compensations likely downturn (Miller and Piotroski, 2000; Nagar et al., 2003; Bebchuk and Grinstein, 2005), litigation risk (Miller and Piotroski, 2000; Brown et al., 2005; Rogers and Stocken, 2005), rising proprietary costs (Verrecchia, 2001 and Dye, 2001), firm performance likely downturn (Miller, 2002) and serious inside trading (Cheng and Lo, 2006; Rogers and Stocken, 2005). In additional to those, this paper incrementally contributes to precedented management forecasts literature. However, to my knowledge, this probably be first paper to document that cunning managers likely alter to disclose management earnings forecasts outside in bias when they face the struggling fiscal condition with credit ratings nearly to be downgraded by credit rating agencies such as Moody's, S&P and Fitch Ratings as to influence the recessive perception of credit rating agencies. When firms are facing enormous pressure of financial distress and their managers also predict their future firm performance will improve, because they hold more insider information than outsiders, thereby more likely to voluntarily disclose good earnings forecasts outside to influence the recessive perception of credit raters by reducing the degree of uncertainty of information asymmetry and alleviating public's nerves about firm likely plump for corporate credit ratings. Therefore, this can fill in this gap in prior management forecast archives. Jung, Soderstrom and Yang (2013) argue that shrewd managers attempt to alter credit ratings agencies' perceptions towards companies worsening borrowing creditability through long-term earnings smoothing activities (i.e. reduction in earnings volatility across horizons). Smoothing techniques include that managers change their accounting disclosing policies by releasing more good-news revenue and better-than-expect earnings forecasts to public prior to credit ratings being slumped/bumped. Furthermore, it also tremendously contributes to voluntary disclosure literature inas much as it can provide additional empirical clues to support the relation between corporate voluntary disclosures and credit ratings after controlling macroeconomic, institutional factors and other fixed effects.This paper uses S&P 1500 firms as samples during the period to examine the relation between management forecast policy and firm financial distress proxied by credit ratings. Using S&P 1500 firms as sample due to sum of those firms' market value can cover over 80% of the U.S. market capitalization and the reasons of those firm higher coverage by financial analysts, reducing the risk of the biased-collection from database. In this paper, I examine how downgrade risks of credit ratings the managers faced influence management earnings forecast policy i.e. whether firms with currently facing downgrade risk of their credit ratings and that in concurrent with the condition that being forecast to have better future performance, managers of those are likely to issue good-news management guidance and the ex post effect i.e. whether those firms will experience a change in cost of debts after good management earnings guidance are being released. More importantly, this paper will also deal with the results potentially suffering from the endogeneity/simultaneity by adopting 2 stage regressions to stimulate the like hood in upside down possibility of credit ratings & 3 stage regressions to estimate both Management forecast incentives and like hood in change in credit ratings, thereby finding the effect of like hood of downward of credit ratings on change in managers' forecast incentives and the effect of the managers' forecast incentive on corporate cost of capital.