Misreporting As Strategic Experimentation: Theory and Evidence

Yi Chen,Kai Du,Shuyang Wang,Zhe Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3499120

2019-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We propose a two-period model wherein two firms select the level of misreporting in the presence of a sequentially rational regulator, who weighs the benefits of correcting misreporting against an enforcement cost unknown to the firms. Each firm strategically experiments with misreporting to learn about that cost, while free-riding on the information revealed by the peer firm’s misreporting action. In response, the regulator bluffs with more aggressive enforcement in the first period. The model implies that misreporting increases with the mean of enforcement cost and regulatory spillover, decreases with the regulator's decision horizon, the observability of peer’s misreporting, and the cost correlation between firms, and is convex in regulatory uncertainty. A firm’s responsiveness to its peer’s past misreporting increases with peer observability and cost correlation. Empirical tests generally support the model's predictions.