Do CSR Awards Motivate Award Winners' Competitors to Undertake CSR Activities?

Jiangyan Li,Xiwei Yi,Wei Shi,Dongfang Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.180

2018-01-01

Abstract:This study proposes that firms that witnessed competitors’ winning corporate social responsibility (CSR) awards will experience an upward comparison, which can motivate them to undertake intensive ...

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Keeping Up with the Joneses: Role of CSR Awards in Incentivizing Non-Winners’ CSR

Jiangyan Li,Juelin Yin,Wei Shi,Xiwei Yi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320982271

2020-01-01

Business & Society

Abstract:We attempt to provide a novel antecedent of corporate social responsibility (CSR) by focusing on the role of CSR awards. Specifically, we investigate how competitors’ winning CSR awards incentivize non-winning firms’ CSR as a competitive catch-up. Using a difference-in-differences research design, we find that non-winners improve their CSR after their competitors have won CSR awards. Furthermore, based on the awareness-motivation-capability (AMC) framework from the competitive dynamics literature, we find that the media visibility of award winners, the performance gap of non-winners with award winners, and the prior CSR of non-winners strengthen the CSR competitive catch-up behaviors. Findings from this study contribute to the CSR research by highlighting the spillover effect of CSR awards as a meaningful event in incentivizing non-winning firms’ CSR and extending the AMC framework to explain the contingency factors of competitive catch-up in the context of CSR research.
CSR awarding: A test of social reputation and impression management

Ali Uyar,Ali Meftah Gerged,Cemil Kuzey,Amal Hamrouni,Abdullah S. Karaman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103706

IF: 3.399

2024-10-31

International Review of Economics & Finance

Abstract:Few studies have examined whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement, reporting, and report attributes help companies win awards and whether award winners continue to maintain their CSR efforts after being recognized. We address this gap by conducting an empirical analysis using social reputation, signaling theory, and impression management theory. The logistics regression analysis is based on a sample of 45,840 firm-year observations from various sectors and countries between 2002 and 2019. Our results show that CSR engagement, CSR reporting, external CSR report assurance, and adoption of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines all help companies win awards. Additionally, companies that win awards tend to maintain their commitment to CSR engagement, reporting, third-party CSR report assurance, and GRI adoption after being awarded. This finding implies that CSR-awarded firms do not consider CSR commitment and reporting a tactical commitment but rather a strategic purpose, ruling out the possibility of impression management.

economics,business, finance
Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: A Moderated Mediation Model of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity.

Wei Wang,Ying Fu,Huiqing Qiu,James H. Moore,Zhongming Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01906

IF: 3.8

2017-01-01

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Corporate social responsibility (CSR) research is not new, but its importance to today's socially conscious market environment is even more evident in recent years. This study moves beyond CSR as simply the socially responsible actions and policies of organizations and focuses on the complex psychology of CSR as it relates to individuals within the organization. Given CSR can positively affect both the individuals within the organization and the organization itself, better understanding and leveraging the mechanisms and conditions of CSR that facilitate desired employee outcomes is crucial for organizational performance. However, scholars lack consensus in determining a theoretical framework for understanding how and under what conditions CSR will make an impact on employees and ultimately organizational performance. This study adds clarity by exploring the effect of perceived CSR on a more comprehensive set of employees' attitudinal and behavioral reactions (i.e., turnover intention, in-role job performance, and helping behavior) via the mediating mechanism of organizational identification and the moderating condition of moral identity. Hypotheses were derived using social identity theory. Results were based on data obtained from 340 Chinese manufacturing employee-supervisor dyads. This study found that employees' perceived CSR had an indirect relationship via organizational identification with each of the variables: (1) turnover intention, (2) in-role job performance, and (3) helping behavior. Specifically, the negative relationship between perceived CSR and turnover intention was stronger when employees had higher moral identity and the positive relationship between perceived CSR and in-role job performance and helping behavior was amplified by moral identity. Our findings show how the mediating mechanism of organizational identity and the moderating condition of moral identity work together to improve organizational effectiveness. The findings reveal several ways in which organizations can strategically focus their CSR and human resource efforts, such as applying this model and focusing on moral identity as a key indicator when evaluating employees.
Impacts of Distributional Social Comparison Behavior on Corporate Social Responsibility: Power of the Small

Mingzheng Wang,Zizhuo Wang,Xin Fang,Ying-Ju Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3350157

2019-01-01

Abstract:Motivated by the emergence of various corporate social responsibility (CSR) rankings and awards, we study the impacts of distributional social comparison behavior of firms on CSR in a supply chain, consisting of one manufacturer and one retailer. Both the manufacturer and the retailer can choose to make CSR investment, which attracts CSR-concerned consumers. We consider two types of social comparison behavior: ahead seeking that makes one willing to overperform relative to others, and ahead averse that results in underperforming. We find that if the retailer is a large enterprise who has strong negotiation power in the supply chain, his ahead-seeking behavior cannot motivate the up-tier manufacturer to increase CSR investment. In contrast, if the retailer is small, his ahead-seeking behavior can lead to significant increase in the manufacturer’s CSR investment. This is because the increased market share achieved by the small ahead-seeking retailer makes it profitable for the manufacturer to increase CSR investment. Interestingly, the total CSR investment of the supply chain is also higher with the small ahead-seeking retailer than that with the large ahead-seeking retailer. On the other hand, the ahead-averse behavior of the retailer increases the manufacturer’s CSR investment if the retailer is large, whereas it reduces the manufacturer’s investment if the retailer is small. While many contemporary CSR rankings and awards are for large firms in practice, our results suggest that governments and NGOs should pay more attention to small firms, motivating their ahead-seeking behavior or deterring ahead-averse behavior through rankings and awards. Measures to promote consumers’ social consciousness are also helpful to leverage the benefit of ahead-seeking behavior or to offset the negative effect of ahead-averse behavior.
The Effects of CEO Awards on Corporate Social Responsibility Focus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05411-2

IF: 6.331

2023-04-16

Journal of Business Ethics

Abstract:Integrating stakeholder agency theory with the instrumental corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature, this study explores how award-winning CEOs consider personal interests and balance competing stakeholder demands when they decide between external and internal CSR, or CSR focus. Using a difference-in-differences research design, we find that after winning a prestigious media award, CEOs engage in more external CSR, which is more visible to the public, and less internal CSR, which is less likely to attract public attention. We find that such an influence on CSR focus is more salient for award-winning CEOs with lower stock ownership (i.e. a stronger self-serving motivation) than for CEOs with higher stock ownership. Furthermore, we explore the role of stakeholder salience in modifying award-winning CEOs' decisions about CSR focus. When external stakeholder salience is higher (e.g. higher media coverage), award-winning CEOs' manipulation of CSR focus by increasing external CSR and decreasing internal CSR is more salient. However, such effects can be dampened when internal stakeholder salience is higher (e.g. higher human capital intensity). Our study contributes to the instrumental CSR literature by demonstrating the underlying processes and boundary conditions of how awards affect CEOs' balance of stakeholder salience.

business,ethics
Can Corporate Social Responsibility Promote Employees’ Taking Charge? The Mediating Role of Thriving at Work and the Moderating Role of Task Significance

Aimin Yan,Liping Tang,Yingchun Hao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613676

IF: 3.8

2021-01-28

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:There is growing evidence to suggest that employees’ perceptions of their employer’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) positively influences their attitude and behavior. An increasing number of scholars have called for further explorations of the microfoundations of CSR. To that end, this study takes the conservation of resources perspective to examine relationships and the perception of CSR by employees, considering areas such as thriving at work, task significance, and employees taking charge. By analyzing 444 questionnaires completed by employees in China and using the conditional process analysis to test a hypothesis, results showed that the association between employees’ CSR perception and taking charge is significantly and positively correlated, with thriving at work mediating the connection. We also found that task significance negatively moderates the mediating effect between CSR and taking charge, such that the lower the level of task significance of a job, the more positive the effect of CSR on taking charge via thriving at work. These findings have theoretical implications for micro-level CSR research and managerial implications for entrepreneurs.

psychology, multidisciplinary
CSR by Any Other Name? The Differential Impact of Substantive and Symbolic CSR Attributions on Employee Outcomes

Magda B. L. Donia,Sigalit Ronen,Carol-Ann Tetrault Sirsly,Silvia Bonaccio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3673-5

IF: 6.331

2017-09-01

Journal of Business Ethics

Abstract:Employing a time-lagged sample of 371 North American individuals working full time in a wide range of industries, occupations, and levels, we contribute to research on employee outcomes of corporate social responsibility (CSR) attributions as substantive (cause-serving) or symbolic (self-serving). Utilizing a mediated moderation model, our study extends previous findings by explaining how and why CSR attributions are related with work-related attitudes and subsequent individual performance. In support of our hypotheses, our findings indicate that the relationships between CSR attributions and individual performance are mediated through person–organization fit and work-related attitudes. Additionally, when CSR is perceived as important, substantive CSR is positively related to, and symbolic CSR is negatively related to, perception of fit with the organization. These findings contribute toward our understanding of the complex effect CSR has on employees’ work outcomes. Practical implications and future research directions are discussed.

business,ethics
CEO Awards and Financial Misconduct

Jiangyan Li,Wei Shi,Brian Connelly,Xiwei Yi,Xin Qin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320921438

IF: 13.5

2020-01-01

Journal of Management

Abstract:We propose that CEOs are more likely to engage in financial misconduct after the media names them as being among the best business leaders. We theorize this occurs because winning such an award is a meaningful event that increases the CEO’s self-worth but also increases the CEO’s sense of psychological entitlement, including the freedom to break rules. We test our ideas by examining scenarios where award-winning CEOs feel especially entitled and therefore are most likely to commit misconduct. Using a sample of award-winning CEOs from Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that award-winning CEOs are more likely to commit financial misconduct in the post-award period than in the pre-award period. In addition, the effect of winning a CEO award on financial misconduct is stronger when CEOs are underpaid or from industries in which awards are rare and therefore more special. We also validate aspects of our theory that are difficult to observe. First, we use bivariate probit models with partial observability to confirm that our results hold when accounting for unobserved misconduct. Second, we use survey data that capture the psychological entitlement of a subsample of CEOs to confirm the mediating effect of psychological entitlement on the relationship between winning an award and committing financial misconduct.
Executives' academic experience and corporate social responsibility: A case study in China

XiFeng Yang,MeiHui Qi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305813

IF: 3.7

2024-06-25

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Fulfilling corporate social responsibility (CSR) is crucial for society's sustainable development. Executives' academic experience significantly affects their awareness of social responsibility, value orientation, professional ability, and network resources. Thus, it is critical in CSR-related corporate decision-making. This paper explores the impact of executives' academic experience on the fulfillment of CSR. It focuses on non-financial, Special treatment enterprises (ST), and ST* enterprises listed in the A-share market from 2012 to 2021. It utilizes a fixed-effects analysis model to examine the relationship between executives' academic experience and CSR fulfillment. The CSR score and executives' academic experience were positively correlated. This paper also explores the intermediary role of compensation incentives and the moderating effect of marketization level. Both compensation incentives and the level of marketization positively moderated the relationship between executives' academic experience and CSR fulfillment. Meanwhile, the robustness results showed that the experimental findings still held after replacing the explained and explanatory variables. This paper contributes to the advancement of the Upper Echelons Theory and provides empirical evidence for the society's sustainable development.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Employees Motivation—Broadening the Perspective

Jennifer Kunz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-020-00089-9

2020-04-01

Schmalenbach Business Review

Abstract:The impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on firm performance is an important issue in organizational research and has been discussed for decades. Only lately, scholars turned their attention towards aspects on an individual level, like the relation between CSR and work satisfaction or work engagement. However, still our understanding of how CSR activities shape organizational outcomes by affecting employees' motivation remains piecemeal. The present paper adds to this stream by analyzing the impact of CSR activities on employees' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Findings indicate that CSR activities both on a firm and on a supra-organizational level have a positive impact on intrinsic motivation, while not affecting extrinsic motivation, i.e. CSR neither fosters nor impedes extrinsic motivation. As a consequence the commitment to CSR can be applied as an effective instrument to induce intrinsic motivation without compromising extrinsic motivation. Furthermore, results point to a non-additive impact of CSR engagement at both levels, which indicates a complex joint impact of CSR engagement on different organizational levels on employees' intrinsic motivation.
Does CSR reputation mitigate the impact of corporate social irresponsibility?

Meijui Sun,Ming-Chang Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00134-y

2020-09-11

Abstract:This study investigates the valuation and performance effects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and irresponsibility (CSiR) activities adopted by 72 CSR-awarded and 87 nonawarded listed firms in Taiwan. Focusing on 1368 CSR/CSiR events during 2008–2011, this study provides an overview and a comparison of CSR/CSiR activities in an emerging Asian economy and focuses on the reputation and buffering effects of CSiR events. The results show that CSR activities are accompanied by improved performance. Compared with nonawarded firms, when CSR-awarded firms experience CSiR events, their investors impose stricter punishments. Consequently, the performance of CSR-awarded firms is inferior to that of nonawarded firms. This empirical work shows that firms with high CSR reputations are not buffered from the consequences of scandal and clarifies the incongruent and mixed findings regarding the CSR–performance relationship in the existing literature.

management,business
How Do Firms Obtain Benefits from Quality Awards: an Empirical Study of the Winners of the China Quality Award

Xingxi Li,Su Wu,Huiming Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-08-2022-0474

2024-01-01

International Journal of Operations & Production Management

Abstract:PurposeQuality awards are widely considered symbols of successful quality management. The purpose of this paper is to empirically test the effects of the China Quality Award (CQA) on firms' performance. The study further explores how the benefits due to CQA are affected by contextual factors.Design/methodology/approachUsing the data of CQA winners from 2001 to 2016, the event study method is applied to analyze the abnormal performance of winners. Furthermore, multiple regression models are proposed to evaluate the effects of contextual factors on the relationship between the award and profitability.FindingsThe findings show that CQA has positive impacts on profitability and fixed asset efficiency but not on labor productivity. Besides, state-owned firms and firms with high innovation intensity obtain more profitability benefits than others.Originality/valueThis is the first study to explain the relationship between quality awards and firm performance from a theoretical perspective, providing new insights into the quality management and performance literature. Furthermore, this study deepens the understanding of the relationship between quality awards and performance and reveals new implications. Some of the contextual factors examined, such as innovation intensity, are considered for the first time in quality award research.
Determinants of Managerial Values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China

Liangrong Zu,Lina Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9828-7

IF: 6.331

2008-06-10

Journal of Business Ethics

Abstract:This article empirically investigates how Chinese executives and managers perceive and interpret corporate social responsibility (CSR), to what extent firms’ productive characteristics influence managers’ attitudes towards their CSR rating, and whether their values in favour of CSR are positively correlated to firms’ economic performance. Although a large proportion of respondents express a favourable view of CSR and a willingness to participate in socially responsible activities, we find that the true nature of their assertion is linked to entrepreneurs’ instincts of gaining economic benefits. It is the poorly performing firms, or rather, firms with vulnerable indicators – smaller in size, State-owned, producing traditional goods and located in poorer regions that are more likely to have managers who opt for a higher CSR rating. Managers’ personal characteristics per se are not significant in determining their CSR choice. Moreover, controlling for other observed variables, we find that managers’ CSR orientation is positively correlated with their firms’ performance. The better-off a firm is, the more likely its manager is to get involve in CSR activities. Firms with better economic performance before their restructuring would sustain higher post-restructuring performance.

business,ethics
Struggling With Business Corporate Cynical Impression? Powerful Methods of CSR to Enhance Corporate Image and Consumer Purchase Intention

Andrianarivo Andriandafiarisoa Ralison Ny Avotra,Ye Chengang,Xu Wei,Jiang Ming,Tsimisaraka Raymondo Sandra Marcelline

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.726727

IF: 5.2

2021-09-03

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:This study focuses on the perception of Chinese students about the image of the company and their purchase intention if the organization has a business cynical impression in the minds of its targeted customers. The study proposed three different types of corporate social responsibility (CSR) to cope up with the organizational cynical impression. These types are Economic and Legal CSR, Philanthropic CSR, and Ethical CSR. The main objective of this study is to determine which CSR type is better to reduce the corporate cynical impression on corporate image and the purchase intentions of consumers. In the study design, the bootstrap approach and AMOS 24 were employed to deal with mediation. The researchers recruited 500 individuals from different educational institutions in China using a simple random selection process. The outcomes of this study indicated that all three types of CSR are successful in mitigating the detrimental effects of corporate cynicism on the image of a firm and the purchase intentions of consumers. A more effective technique of boosting the corporate image of a company and purchase intention of a consumer is via charitable CSR, which may help restore the image of a company and the purchase intention of a consumer that has been affected by corporate cynicism among its target customers.

public, environmental & occupational health
Corporate social responsibility performance and social reputation via corporate social responsibility awarding: is there a threshold effect?

Cemil Kuzey,Ali Uyar,Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili,Abdullah S. Karaman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-03-2023-0128

2023-12-15

Corporate Governance (Bingley)

Abstract:Purpose This study aims to examine the potential threshold effect in the association between corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and social reputation. Design/methodology/approach This study includes an international and cross-sector sample covering 41 countries, nine sectors and 45,395 firm-year observations. It applies a parabolic relationship, rather than linear regressions, between CSR engagement and social reputation via CSR awarding. This implies that CSR performance should increase until a certain point to gain a social reputation but then should decrease after reaching that threshold point considering limited financial resources. Findings The findings of country-industry-year fixed-effects logistic regressions confirm the threshold effect with an inverted U-shaped relationship between CSR and CSR awarding. More specifically, firms increase their environmental and social engagement until a certain point, and then they reduce it after reaching a social reputation. This finding is confirmed by three dimensions of the environmental pillar (i.e. resource use, emissions and eco-innovation) as well as four dimensions of the social pillar (i.e. workforce, human rights, community and product responsibility). The findings are robust to alternative samples, alternative methodology and endogeneity concerns. Practical implications The findings of this study have implications for firms about the better allocation of available funds between CSR and operations. The findings could be particularly useful for CSR teams/committees of the firms who formulate CSR policies and how to mobilize firm resources for better social enhancement via environmental and social reputation. Originality/value This study examines deeper the nature of the association between CSR engagement and social reputation and considers the possibility of an inverted U-shaped relationship between them. The determination of a threshold effect suggests that CSR engagement increases social reputation, but once it reaches a certain point, social reputation will decrease owing to financial resource constraints.

English Else
The Role of CSR Information on Social Media to Promote the Communicative Behavior of Customers: An Emotional Framework Enriching Behavioral Sciences Literature

Zhijuan Li,Muhammad Safdar Sial,Hualiang Wu,Sorinel Căpușneanu,Cristian-Marian Barbu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020126

2023-02-02

Abstract:Studies have shown that an organization's corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities affect customer behaviors such as loyalty and satisfaction. In spite of this, the role of social media in informing customers about a brand's CSR activities and in fostering customer advocacy behavior (CADB) has been underexplored. To fill this knowledge gap, this study investigates the relationship between the CSR-related communication of a banking organization and CADB. This study also examines how emotions such as customer-company identification (CCI) and gratitude as a mediator and a moderator. Using a self-administered questionnaire (n = 302), we collected data from banking customers. Hypotheses were evaluated by using structural equation modeling, which revealed that CSR positively predicts CADB, whereas there are mediating and moderating functions of CCI and GA. Theoretically, this study highlights the role of human emotions in behavior formation from the standpoint of social media. Practically, this study provides important insights for the banking sector's administrators to realize the important role of CSR communication, using different social networking websites, for converting customers into brand advocates.
Do all brand CSR initiatives make consumers happy? The role of CSR-brand (mis)fit and sense of relatedness

Faheem Gul Gilal,Naeem Gul Gilal,Luis F. Martinez,Rukhsana Gul Gilal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-01-2022-3849

2023-02-26

Journal of Product & Brand Management

Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to explore whether brand corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives increase consumers' happiness via a mediating mechanism of emotional brand attachment and to examine how brand CSR's effect may be moderated by CSR fit (e.g. CSR-brand fit vs misfit) and sense of relatedness (e.g. low vs high). Design/methodology/approach A series of six studies (including the one that is available online), combining field and experimental data, were conducted to test the hypothesized relationships. Findings Results support the hypothesis that brand CSR initiatives make consumers happy by increasing their attachment to the brand (Studies 1 and 2). This effect is strengthened both directly and indirectly through emotional attachment when brands engage in CSR fit activities (Study 3), but it is weakened when brands engage in CSR misfit activities (Study 4). Furthermore, the effect is more pronounced when brands choose CSR activities that have a high sense of relatedness, and it is eliminated when brands use CSR activities with a low sense of relatedness (Study 5). Finally, the results indicate that when brand CSR programs make consumers happy, they become more likely to purchase, spread positive word of mouth and pay a premium (Study 6). Originality/value This research has several major implications for business-to-consumer companies that are unsure about the value of brand CSR initiatives, want to make consumers happy but are unsure which CSR strategies to focus on and/or have decided to launch CSR initiatives but lack guidance on the specific strategies relevant to their desired performance outcomes.

management,business
The attribution effects of CSR motivations on brand advocacy: psychological distance matters!

Ahmad Aljarah,Bassam Dalal,Blend Ibrahim,Eva Lahuerta-Otero

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2022.2041603

2022-02-17

Abstract:Companies are becoming increasingly involved in corporate social responsibility (CSR) to enhance their self- rather than public interests, and this has made CSR ambiguous when considering organizational goodwill. This study therefore investigated the relative effects of CSR motivations on brand advocacy while considering psychological distance as a moderating variable. Two between-subject experiments were conducted using coffee shop customers in the United States as participants. The findings revealed that customers demonstrate more brand advocacy toward a company when they believe the company has conducted a CSR activity with a public-serving motivation than when they believe the company has conducted a CSR activity with a firm-serving motivation. Furthermore, customers demonstrate greater brand advocacy with respect to public-serving motivations when a firm’s spatial or temporal CSR initiative distances are low (when there are local or present benefits, respectively). However, customers demonstrate greater brand advocacy with respect to firm-serving motivations when a company conducts a CSR initiative with a low social distance (when there are in-group benefits).
Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility

Sankar Sen,C.B. Bhattacharya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838

IF: 6.1

2001-05-01

Journal of Marketing Research

Abstract:In the face of marketplace polls that attest to the increasing influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on consumers' purchase behavior, this article examines when, how, and for whom specific CSR initiatives work. The findings implicate both company-specific factors, such as the CSR issues a company chooses to focus on and the quality of its products, and individual-specific factors, such as consumers' personal support for the CSR issues and their general beliefs about CSR, as key moderators of consumers' responses to CSR. The results also highlight the mediating role of consumers' perceptions of congruence between their own characters and that of the company in their reactions to its CSR initiatives. More specifically, the authors find that CSR initiatives can, under certain conditions, decrease consumers' intentions to buy a company's products.

business

Do CSR Awards Motivate Award Winners' Competitors to Undertake CSR Activities?

Keeping Up with the Joneses: Role of CSR Awards in Incentivizing Non-Winners’ CSR

CSR awarding: A test of social reputation and impression management

Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: A Moderated Mediation Model of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity.

Impacts of Distributional Social Comparison Behavior on Corporate Social Responsibility: Power of the Small

The Effects of CEO Awards on Corporate Social Responsibility Focus

Can Corporate Social Responsibility Promote Employees’ Taking Charge? The Mediating Role of Thriving at Work and the Moderating Role of Task Significance

CSR by Any Other Name? The Differential Impact of Substantive and Symbolic CSR Attributions on Employee Outcomes

CEO Awards and Financial Misconduct

Executives' academic experience and corporate social responsibility: A case study in China

Corporate Social Responsibility and Employees Motivation—Broadening the Perspective

Does CSR reputation mitigate the impact of corporate social irresponsibility?

How Do Firms Obtain Benefits from Quality Awards: an Empirical Study of the Winners of the China Quality Award

Determinants of Managerial Values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China

Struggling With Business Corporate Cynical Impression? Powerful Methods of CSR to Enhance Corporate Image and Consumer Purchase Intention

Corporate social responsibility performance and social reputation via corporate social responsibility awarding: is there a threshold effect?

The Role of CSR Information on Social Media to Promote the Communicative Behavior of Customers: An Emotional Framework Enriching Behavioral Sciences Literature

Do all brand CSR initiatives make consumers happy? The role of CSR-brand (mis)fit and sense of relatedness

The attribution effects of CSR motivations on brand advocacy: psychological distance matters!

Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility