Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to find out how corporate social responsibility (CSR) is viewed in the Chinese situation. The paper views CSR as an endogenous motivation for corporate social behaviour. The intended contributions of this paper are twofold. On the one hand, the authors intend to collect first‐hand data to understand the current status of Chinese managers' cognitions of CSR. On the other hand the paper intends to analyse the differences which exist in managers' cognitions on CSR among different kinds of firms in a Chinese context.Design/methodology/approachA random survey was conducted among 157 businessmen using the force‐choice questionnaire, based on the four‐part construct proposed by Carroll. The confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to test the construct validity of Carroll's conceptual model with the data sample drawn from Chinese situation. Then correlation, six pairwise t‐tests and MANOVA test were conducted for the purpose of this study.FindingsChinese managers' cognition of CSR is found to be consistent with the four‐component construct. A relatively strong preference toward economic component has been examined. The results present a significant negative correlation between economic cognition and all three of its non‐economic counterparts. No significant cognitive differences have been verified between firms with different characteristics.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper initially examined the cognition of Chinese managers toward CSR. Chinese managers are viewed as having an important role in decision making on social issues. However, how to promote the managers' cognition of CSR is needed for future research which will also examine the internal driving mechanism of CSR.Originality/valueThere has not been a great deal of empirical research done in the field of social responsibility in China. This study is a starting point for those who seek to understand the economic and sociological aspects of mainland Chinese business.

How Do Firms Obtain Benefits from Quality Awards: an Empirical Study of the Winners of the China Quality Award

An Empirical Exploration of Quality Management Practices and Firm Performance from Chinese Manufacturing Industry

The Sustainable Effect of Operational Performance on Financial Benefits: Evidence from Chinese Quality Awards Winners

Chinese Managers' Cognition of Corporate Social Responsibility: an Empirical Investigation

Nonmonetary awards and innovation: Evidence from winning China's Top Brand Contest

Can environmental awards stimulate corporate green technology innovation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies

Investigating the TQM Practice of Enterprises Winning China Quality Award: A Grounded Theory Perspective.

The impact of supply chain practices and quality management on firm performance: Evidence from China's small and medium manufacturing enterprises

How do investors respond to Green Company Awards in China?

A Study of Enterprise Management Innovation and Quality Award Based on Performance Excellence Model-A Case Study of Zhejiang Province

The U-shaped impact of export quality on firms’ innovation output: Empirical evidence from China

The Quality Management, Operational Capability And Financial Performance In Chinese Manufacturing Companies

Keeping Up with the Joneses: Role of CSR Awards in Incentivizing Non-Winners’ CSR

Does Administrative Approval Impede Low-Quality Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms

Doing Well by Doing Good? the Case of Housing Construction Quality in China

The Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

The impact of government intervention on corporate environmental performance: Evidence from China's national civilized city award

CEO Awards and Financial Misconduct

Corporate Social Responsibility and High-quality Development: Do Green Innovation, Environmental Investment and Corporate Governance Matter?

Socially Responsible Leaders Driving Firm Performance:Evidence from Leading Chinese Companies

Market-Incentive Environmental Regulation and the Quality of Corporate Innovation