Abstract:Traditional methodologies for measuring visual distraction have been limiting in their approaches, treating distraction as a one-dimensional variable. This has been accomplished either by categorizing distraction as a binary variable or using surrogate measurements, such as reaction time in response to non-driving related tasks, which follow the procedures of measuring distraction from psychology. Furthermore, as human-vehicle interaction (HVI) under automated driving has the potential to provide safety information and bring visual distraction simultaneously, there lacks an investigation on the quantitative relationship between distraction and safety due to the restrained methodologies in measuring visual distraction. As HVI-induced driver distraction plays a critical role in determining safe driving under automated driving, a methodology is highly needed to comprehensively measure the visual distraction under automated driving so that its impact on safety can be further investigated. Therefore, sticking to the definition of visual distraction, this research aims to (1) improve the existing methodology in measuring HVI-induced driver distraction under automated driving by focusing on visual distraction and mathematically describing it from spatiotemporal and directional dimensions; (2) theoretically investigate how the quantified visual distraction influences driving safety and (3) quantify the relationship between distraction and safety with introducing the "distraction-safety" ratio. Drivers' fixation behaviors are used in quantifying visual distraction, which is measured by spatiotemporal and directional relationships between drivers' visual attention and the attention that indicates "zero distraction". Three newly added performance measures in quantifying HVI-induced visual distraction are real-time magnitudes, real-time directions, and intensities (cumulation of magnitudes over time). To validate the proposed methods, a verification study was conducted by recruiting drivers to test automated driving under Level 3 automation. Drivers are required to wear an eye-tracker and go through two scenarios interacting with jaywalkers where takeover actions are needed with two takeover warnings ("visual-only" and "visual & audible"). Per past studies, takeover time was measured in representing distraction level. As a result, this study confirms the validity of the proposed methods by revealing the significant and positive correlations between the measured distraction intensity and the takeover time. Discussions of the quantified visual distraction from the spatiotemporal and directional perspective further enhance the understanding of HVI-induced driver distraction under automated driving through multiple dimensions. Furthermore, this research reveals how distracted driving affects safety under automated driving through the takeover performance. Thresholds under visual distraction magnitudes and degrees that lead to traffic conflicts were identified. More importantly, a "distraction-safety" ratio that quantifies the relationship between visual distraction and safety benefits is proposed. The results suggest that the "visual & audible" is more effective in significantly enhancing safety while aggregating a significantly smaller amount of visual distraction. The contribution of this research is to re-define the methodological approach of measuring visual distraction by (1) measuring distraction multi-dimensionally and (2) establishing a "distraction-safety" system in quantitatively assessing the balance of safety benefits and the HVI-induced visual distraction magnitude under automated driving environment.

Impact of Screen Size and Structure of IVIS on Driving Distraction

In-Vehicle Information System and Driving Safety

The Effect of Touchscreen Layout Division on the Usability and Driving Safety of In-Vehicle Information Systems

Assessing driver distraction from in-vehicle information system: an on-road study exploring the effects of input modalities and secondary task types

Influence of In-vehicle Information System Operation on Driver Action Distraction

Support Vector Machines for the Identification of Real-Time Driving Distraction Using In-Vehicle Information Systems

Risk Identification of In-Vehicle Information System Operation Based on Traffic Environment Complexity

Age-Related Differences in the Cognitive, Visual, and Temporal Demands of In-Vehicle Information Systems

Multitasking While Driving: How Drivers Self-Regulate Their Interaction with In-Vehicle Touchscreens in Automated Driving

Driver distraction and in-vehicle interventions: A driving simulator study on visual attention and driving performance

Designing Touchscreen Menu Interfaces for In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems: the Effect of Depth and Breadth Trade-off and Task Types on Visual-Manual Distraction

The Effects of Head-Up Display Clutter and In-Vehicle Display Separation on Concurrent Driving Performance

Distractions Intervention Strategies for In-Vehicle Secondary Tasks: an On-Road Test Assessment of Driving Task Demand Based on Real-Time Traffic Environment

Transitioning to multi-dimensional estimation of visual distraction and its safety effects under automated driving: A spatiotemporal and directional estimation approach

Evaluation of Gesture-Based In-Vehicle Interaction: User Experience and the Potential to Reduce Driver Distraction

Study on drivers' visual perception characteristics during the take‐over of vehicle control in automated driving

The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.

Impacts of information quantity and display formats on driving behaviors in a connected vehicle environment

Risk Assessment of Distracted Driving Behavior Based on Visual Stability Coefficient

Analysis of influence on driver behaviour while using in‐vehicle traffic lights with application of head‐up display

Chinese handwriting while driving: effects of handwritten box size on in-vehicle information systems usability and driver distraction