Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine how auditors would react when there are exogenous negative shocks to their client portfolios. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 31,256 firm-year observations (2001–2016), the authors investigate whether industry shocks to a subset of an auditor’s clients distract the auditor and affect the professional skepticism applied in the audits of other clients. Findings The authors find that clients of distracted auditors are more likely to meet or beat analyst consensus forecasts, suggesting that auditors’ professional skepticism is compromised by distractive events. The cross-sectional analyses reveal that the negative impact of the distractive events on audit quality is more pronounced when the distracted auditors audit less important clients, face lower third-party legal liabilities and experience higher growth. Using an alternative measure of audit quality, the additional analysis shows that clients of distracted auditors exhibit a higher probability of restating their earnings in subsequent years. Overall, the empirical evidence suggests that when distracted, auditors render lower quality audit. Originality/value The study complements recent work by Cassell et al. (2019), which shows that the 2008–2009 financial crisis affected the quality of the audits of nonbank clients of bank-specialized auditors. While Cassell et al. (2019) focus on one shock (financial crisis) to one industry (i.e. the financial services industry), the study examines more frequent shocks over a wide range of industries to identify the potential effects of distractive events, improving the generalizability of the findings to all industries and all auditors (specialist and nonspecialist) in nonrecession periods.

Big N Audit Quality Effect: New Evidence on Audit Hours and Audit Adjustments

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?

Do Client Characteristics Really Drive the Big N Audit Quality Effect? New Evidence from Propensity Score Matching

Does joining global accounting firm networks and associations affect audit quality and audit pricing? Evidence from China

How Big-4 Firms Improve Audit Quality

Effects of Auditing Fee on Auditing Quality: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China

Audit Effort and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Audit Firms’ Tax Adjustments in China

Do Individual Auditors Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from Archival Data

The effect of individual auditor quality on audit outcomes: opening the black box of audit quality

Does International Accounting Network Membership Affect Audit Fees and Audit Quality? Evidence from China

The scale and scope of the client portfolio and audit quality at the individual auditor level: evidence from China

Unintended Consequences from Downward Audit Adjustments: Evidence from China

Auditor tenure and Audit Quality:Empirical Evidence from the Chinese Securities Market

Employee Quality and Audit Fee: Evidence from China

An Empirical Test of the Relationship between Audit Tenure and Earnings Quality on China Security Market

The Effect of the Timing of Auditor Changes on Annual Reporting Lags and Audit Quality

Auditor Distraction and Audit Quality

Can High Audit Quality Constrain Real Earnings Management

How Can Small International Accounting Firms Improve Audit Quality? The Role of Accounting Associations and Networks