Re-Defining High Risk COPD with Parameter Response Mapping Based on Machine Learning Models
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S369904
2022-10-05
International Journal of COPD
Abstract:Yu Pu, 1, &ast Xiuxiu Zhou, 1, &ast Di Zhang, 1, &ast Yu Guan, 1, &ast Yi Xia, 1 Wenting Tu, 1 Yang Lu, 2 Weidong Zhang, 2 Chi-Cheng Fu, 2 Qu Fang, 2 Geertruida H de Bock, 3 Shiyuan Liu, 1 Li Fan 1 1 Department of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Scientific Research, Shanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; 3 Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Shiyuan Liu; Li Fan, Department of Radiology, ChangZheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, No. 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 21 81886012 ; Tel +86 21 81886012, Fax +86 21 63587668, Email ; Purpose: To explore optimal threshold of FEV1% predicted value (FEV1%pre) for high-risk chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using the parameter response mapping (PRM) based on machine learning classification model. Patients and Methods: A total of 561 consecutive non-COPD subjects who were screened for chest diseases in our hospital between August and October 2018 and who had complete questionnaire surveys, pulmonary function tests (PFT), and paired respiratory chest CT scans were enrolled retrospectively. The CT quantitative parameter for small airway remodeling was PRM, and 72 parameters were obtained at the levels of whole lung, left and right lung, and five lobes. To identify a more reasonable thresholds of FEV1% predicted value for distinguishing high-risk COPD patients from the normal, 80 thresholds from 50% to 129% were taken with a partition of 1% to establish a random forest classification model under each threshold, such that novel PFT-parameter-based high-risk criteria would be more consistent with the PRM-based machine learning classification model. Results: Machine learning-based PRM showed that consistency between PRM parameters and PFT was better able to distinguish high-risk COPD from the normal, with an AUC of 0.84 when the threshold was 72%. When the threshold was 80%, the AUC was 0.72 and when the threshold was 95%, the AUC was 0.64. Conclusion: Machine learning-based PRM is feasible for redefining high-risk COPD, and setting the optimal FEV1% predicted value lays the foundation for redefining high-risk COPD diagnosis. Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, computed tomography, pulmonary function test, quantitative imaging, artificial intelligence Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, with a global prevalence of 11.6%. 1,2 The pulmonary structural abnormalities in COPD patients mainly include airway disease, lung parenchymal damage, and vascular remodeling. 3 Koo et al 4 found that the change of bronchioles in COPD patients occurred earlier than the presence of emphysema; specifically, the wall of bronchioles was thickening, the number of bronchioles was reduced, and the lumen of bronchioles was occluded in Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) I COPD patients. This suggests the importance of early evaluation of the small airway for early warning of COPD. Moreover, airway diseases are shown to be reversible after smoking cessation or proper treatment. 5,6 Therefore, early diagnosis and early intervention for small airway disease may greatly reduce symptoms and delay disease progress. Early diagnosis cannot be achieved using PFT alone, because PFT is abnormal only when lung tissue damage is more than 30% and small airway obstruction is over 75%. 7 Some patients with normal PFTs may still show emphysema, gas trapping, and airway wall thickening on CT images. 8–10 The high-risk COPD or pre-COPD population is believed to be the population at risk of developing spirometrically-defined airflow obstruction in the future. The definitions of high-risk COPD or pre-COPD vary between studies. Regan et al 9 defined high-risk COPD patients as current and former smokers with normal post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC >0.70 and FEV1% predicted value ≥80%. Some researchers proposed that subjects with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC >0.70 and FEV1% predicted value <95% in the absence of a bronchodilator were defined as high-risk patients for COPD. 11 Wan et al 12 found that preserved ratio-impaired spirometry (PRISm) subjects had an FEV1% predicted value <80% predicted by FEV1/FVC ≥0.70. Therefore, -Abstract Truncated-