Abstract:15 Objective: the auditory brainstem response is widely employed to evaluate hearing 16 function of test subjects for both clinical and research purposes. Currently, hearing 17 threshold estimation still relies on trained professionals to assess the audiograms, 18 resulting in the largest cost component of the test. The objective of this study was to 19 develop an automated approach to objectively and reliably detect the hearing thresholds. 20 Design: From eight mice and four human participants, we recorded for each sound level 21 hundreds of single sweeps and asked how many sweeps were minimum required for a 22 . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. was not certified by peer review) (which The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted August 13, 2019. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/19003301 doi: medRxiv preprint NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice. 2 response being detected from cumulative averages using correlation function. We 23 named this procedure the adaptive averaging approach. 24 Result: We found an exponential increase in the required sweeps at near-threshold 25 sound levels, modeling of which allowed objective and precise threshold estimation. 26 The results from mouse and human recordings deviated consistently less than 5 dB 27 from the expert-assessed values. Moreover, up to 69 % sweeps at suprathreshold sound 28 tests were found redundant for the threshold estimation and could be avoided to 29 improve test efficiency. 30 Conclusions: The adaptive averaging approach achieved objective and precise hearing 31 threshold detection and implementation of this approach in commercial recording 32 devices will automate the hearing test in a more reliable and cost-effective way. 33 34 35 INTRODUCTION 36 The auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) are brain electrical potential changes due to 37 the synchronous neuronal activities evoked by suprathreshold acoustic stimuli (Jewett 38 et al., 1970). In a hearing test, surface electrodes are placed on the scalp of the test 39 subject to monitor the threshold sound level below which ABRs are no longer 40 detectable. As a non-invasive technique, the ABR test has been worldwide employed in 41 hospitals and clinics to exam auditory function, particularly for infants, adults with 42 learning disabilities as well as patients undergoing operation, to whom a test through 43 communication or body movements is not applicable (Jacobson et al., 1990). Typical 44 . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. was not certified by peer review) (which The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted August 13, 2019. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/19003301 doi: medRxiv preprint

Comparison of ASSR, ABR and 40 Hz AERP Response Thresholds at Different Frequencies and Their Forensic Applications.

The forensic medicine study of objective auditory function by 40Hz auditory event - related potential and auditory brainstem induced response

Study on long latency auditory evoked potentials and their application value in the forensic medicine

Frequency Characteristics of AEPs in Normal Young Adults and Comparison of Their Response Threshold and Pure Tone Audiometry Threshold

Auditory steady-state response and tone burst auditory brain stem response in threshold prediction

[Application of Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and 40 Hz Auditory Event Related Potential (40 Hz AERP) to the Diagnosis of Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Impairment].

[Threshold Prediction in Adults with Normal Hearing Using ASSR, Tb-ABR and C-Abr: a Within-Subject Comparison].

A comparison between auditory steady-state responses and pure tone threshold in adults with sensorineural hearing loss

Simultaneous acquisition of 80 Hz ASSRs and ABRs from quasi ASSRs for threshold estimation

Comparison of ASSR and Frequency Specificity ABR Induced by NB CE-Chirp for Prediction of Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in Children with Conductive Hearing Loss

Correlation Between Multi-Frequency Steady-State Evoked Potential and Pure-Tone Audiometry in 72 Patients with Conductive Hearing Loss

Study on auditory brainstem response

The Application of Auditory Steady-State Responses to the Neonates Hearing Evaluation

A Pilot Study On Auditory Brainstem Response Evoked With Randomized Stimulation Rate

Towards Effective Assessment of Normal Hearing Function from ABR Using a Time-Variant Sweep-Tone Stimulus Approach.

Real-time Threshold Determination of Auditory Brainstem Responses by Cross-Correlation Analysis

An Efficient and Robust Approach to Detect Auditory Evoked Responses using 1 Adaptive Averaging 2 3

A Controlled Comparison of Auditory Steady-State Responses and Pure-Tone Audiometry in Patients with Hearing Loss

Analysis of Click and Swept-Tone Auditory Brainstem Response Results for Moderate and Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Comparing Auditory Brainstem Responses Evoked by Click and Sweep-Tone in Normal-Hearing Adults

Reliability of Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR): Comparing Thresholds of Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) with Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) in Children with Severe Hearing Loss