Distinct relapse pattern across molecular ependymoma types
Denise Obrecht-Sturm,Melanie Schoof,Alicia Eckhardt,Martin Mynarek,Mark R Gilbert,Kenneth Aldape,Terri S Armstrong,Vijay Ramaswamy,Michael Bockmayr,Katja von Hoff,Gudrun Fleischhack,Jonas E Adolph,Stephan Tippelt,Stefan M Pfister,Kristian Pajtler,Dominik Sturm,Richard Drexler,Franz L Ricklefs,Natalia Stepien,Johannes Gojo,Torsten Pietsch,Monika Warmuth-Metz,Rolf Kortmann,Beate Timmermann,Christine Haberler,Stefan Rutkowski,Ulrich Schüller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae166
2024-08-22
Abstract:Background: Ependymoma (EPN) is not a uniform disease but represents different disease types with biological and clinical heterogeneity. However, the pattern of when and where different types of EPN relapse is not yet comprehensively described. Methods: We assembled 269 relapsed intracranial EPN from pediatric (n=233) and adult (n=36) patients from European and Northern American cohorts and correlated DNA methylation patterns and copy-number alterations with clinical information. Results: The cohort comprised the following molecular EPN types: PF-EPN-A (n=177), ST-EPN-ZFTA (n=45), PF-EPN-B (n=31), PF-EPN-SE (n=12), and ST-EPN-YAP (n=4). First relapses of PF-EPN-B (PF: posterior-fossa) and PF-EPN-SE (SE: subependymoma) occurred later than of PF-EPN-A, ST-EPN-YAP (ST: supratentorial), or ST-EPN-ZFTA (median time to relapse: 4.3 and 6.0 years vs. 1.9/1.0/2.4 years; p<0.01). Metastatic or combined recurrences in PF-EPN-B and -A more often involved the spinal cord than in ST-EPN-ZFTA (72.7% and 40.0 vs. 12.5%; p<0.01). No distant relapses were observed in ST-EPN-YAP (n=4) or PF-EPN-SE (n=12). Post-relapse survival (PRS) was poor for PF-EPN-A and ST-EPN-ZFTA (5-year PRS: 44.5±4.4/47.8±9.1%), whereas PF-EPN-B and PF-EPN-SE displayed a 5-year PRS of 89.5±7.1/90.0±9.5% (p=0.03). However, 10-year PRS for PF-EPN-B dropped to 45.8±17.3%. Neither between radiation field and relapse pattern nor between radiation field and spinal involvement at relapse an impact was identified. Notably, all patients with relapsed ST-EPN-YAP did not receive upfront radiotherapy, but were successfully salvaged using irradiation at relapse. Conclusions: Relapse patterns of specific EPN types are different. Future clinical trials, treatment adaptions, duration of surveillance and diagnostics should be planned incorporating entity-specific relapse information.