Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of intracranial ependymoma in children

余建忠,李昊,施伟,杨逸飞,詹丹旎
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112050-20200107-00011
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of intracranial ependymoma in children.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 36 children with intracranial ependymoma confirmed by postoperative pathological examination at Department of Neurosurgery, Children′s Hospital of Fudan University from January 2008 to December 2016. The male to female ratio of 36 children was 2 ∶1, of whom 17 (47.2%) were younger than 3 years old and 19 (52.8%) were at least 3 years old. Tumors were supratentorial in 11 cases (30.6%) and infratentorial in 25 cases (69.4%). Postoperative radiotherapy was administered in 12 cases and chemotherapy in 7. The related factors affecting the prognosis of children with ependymoma were identified by using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariate regression analysis.Results:Of the 36 patients, 31 (86.1%) cases underwent gross total resection and 5 (13.9%) underwent subtotal resection. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, postoperative pathological examination revealed that WHO grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ were in 6 cases (16.7%) and grade Ⅲ in 30 cases (83.3%). The total survival duration of 36 cases was 1.5-138.0 months, with a median of 49.0 months. The 5-year overall survival rate in 36 cases was 58% (21/36). Univariate analysis results indicated that age, extent of resection, postoperative radiotherapy were associated with the overall survival in children with intracranial ependymoma (all P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that age ( OR=0.086, 95% CI: 0.014-0.513, P=0.007) and extent of resection ( OR =0.111, 95% CI: 0.024-0.515, P=0.005) were independent factors affecting the overall survival of patients with ependymoma. Conclusions:Children with intracranial ependymoma are more common in men, which is more often seen at infratentorial site than supratentorial site. The prognosis seems worse in younger patients. Surgical removal is the major therapy and patients who achieve total resection may have better prognosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?