Detrimental Effect of the Characteristic-Human-Capital-Inputs-Based Horizontal Pay Dispersion on Team Member Work Role Performance via Employee Benign and Malicious Envy: An Evidence from China
Haiyan Zhang,Shuwei Sun,Han Xu,Chuyu Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S383969
IF: 3.974
2022-10-21
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Haiyan Zhang, 1 Shuwei Sun, 2 Han Xu, 1 Chuyu Zhao 1 1 Business School, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China; 2 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Shuwei Sun, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xuzhou University of Technology, No. 2 Lishui Road, Yunlong, Xuzhou, 221111, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 15996963525, Fax +86 051683105396, Email Purpose: Pay for employee characteristic human capital inputs, which results in part of horizontal pay dispersion (HPD) and is well acknowledged by organizations and employees, has been greatly ignored by scholars. This study proposes "the characteristic-human-capital-inputs-based HPD" and explores what impact it tends to exert on team member work role performance (TMWRP), why, and when. Drawing on social comparison theory, goal-setting theory, and self-regulatory depletion theory, we develop a dual-mediation model elaborating the detrimental effect of this type of HPD on TMWRP from the perspective of employee benign and malicious envy and test it using objective and subjective data of 364 members coming from 65 Chinese ordinary employee teams. Methods: We on-site collected objective data including each member's pay level, outcome performance, and characteristic human capital inputs. Using five-point Likert rating method, team supervisors were requested to evaluate each member's TMWRP and members were asked to self-rate benign and malicious envy. Hierarchical regression analysis, simple slope analysis, and bootstrapping approach were employed to verify the model. Results: The characteristic-human-capital-inputs-based HPD adversely affects TMWRP by reducing employee benign envy (the mediating effect=− 0.053, 95% CI=[− 0.111, − 0.002], excluding 0) and enhancing employee malicious envy (the mediating effect=− 0.025, 95% CI=[− 0.059, − 0.004], excluding 0). The positive linkage between employee benign envy and TMWRP is only observed in lower-paid employees (the simple slope=0.145, p 0.10). Conclusion: The characteristic-human-capital-inputs-based HPD, which involves the HPD part mainly resulting from employee differences in characteristic human capital inputs, tends to impair TMWRP through inhibiting employee benign envy and promoting employee malicious envy. Employee pay level is an important boundary condition constraining the positive effect of benign envy on TMWRP. Keywords: the characteristic-human-capital-inputs-based HPD, team member work role performance, employee benign envy, employee malicious envy, employee pay level As organizational structures become flat and team prevails within organizations, 1 more and more horizontal pay comparisons take place among employees who are in the same hierarchy or perform similar jobs within a team. Horizontal pay dispersion (HPD), which refers to the result of the above horizontal pay comparisons, 2 has gradually become a non-negligible factor that profoundly influences employee behaviors. Organizational practitioners are particularly eager to know the potential effects of HPD on employees' team-oriented behaviors which are key to team effectiveness and organizational performance as organizational work systems become increasingly dynamic, uncertain, complex, and task-interdependent. Scholars up to now have explored HPD's impacts on employee effort and engagement, 3–5 workforce productivity, 6 firm's financial performance, 7 innovation performance, 8 trust, 9 affective commitment and turnover, 10 motivation, 11 and behavioral performance. 12 However, these studies have not reached unanimous conclusions. Taking the possible effect of HPD on employee effort for example, some researchers failed to find empirical evidence of positive or negative impact, 3,4 whereas, other researchers revealed that as HPD becomes larger, employee effort goes up and employee sabotage behavior turns stronger. 5 It is the specific shaping basis of pay dispersion that largely determines the consequences of pay dispersion. 6,12–14 As for HPD, however, only several studies exploring its specific shaping basis. 6,11,12 Specifically, Kepes et al took drivers as sample and examined the moderation of performance- or politically based pay on the relationship between HPD and workforce productivity. They found that when larger HPD is attributable to performance-based pay, it is positively related to workplace productivity; when larger HPD is attribut -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary