When Psychological Contract Violation Inhibits Affiliative and Challenging Citizenship

Li Rui,Huihua Zhang,Yan Liu,Cheng Peng Du,Lulu Zhou,Xufan Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.16208abstract

2019-01-01

Abstract:Our research sought to simultaneously examine the effects of psychological contract violation on affiliative and challenging forms of organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs), and, more importantly, to explore the roles that supervisor–subordinate guanxi and power distance orientation play in moderating these effects. Two field studies with different samples of Chinese employees were conducted. Data were collected from two sources (i.e., the employees and their supervisors) at two different time points. In Study 1, we found that: (1) psychological contract violation was negatively related to both helping (an example of affiliative OCBs) and taking charge (an example of challenging OCBs); (2) the relations of psychological contract violation with helping and taking charge were weak when supervisor–subordinate guanxi was strong (versus weak); and (3) the relation of psychological contract violation with helping was weak when employees were high (versus low) in power distance orientation. These results were largely replicated in Study 2 using conscientiousness and voice as examples of affiliative and challenging OCBs, respectively. Theoretical and practical implications of our findings are discussed.