Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to investigate the impact of pay-for-performance (PFP) perception and pay level satisfaction on work attitudes (job satisfaction, turnover intention and affective commitment) and extra-role behaviors (discretionary effort and interpersonal helping), and further, how three aspects of conditional factors – intrinsic motivation, leader–member exchange (LMX) and perceived organizational support (POS) – moderate the main-effect relationships.Design/methodology/approachThe study was conducted at a Chinese private-owned company in the beauty industry, and a survey was conducted with the frontline employees in each office, asking information about their perceptions and attitudes toward the PFP scheme implemented in the company, work attitudes and performance, individual characteristics and their perceptions of group and organizational characteristics.FindingsResults show that PFP perception and pay level satisfaction are significant predictors of work attitudes and extra-role behaviors. Further, depending on the specific work outcome examined, the three conditioning factors are found to strengthen the hypothesized main-effect relationships. The findings of the study have important theoretical and practical implications for the implementation of PFP schemes in organizations.Originality/valueThe findings contribute to the scholarship on PFP schemes in two ways. First, the findings show that PFP perception and pay level satisfaction are important for understanding employee work attitudes and extra-role behaviors. Second, the investigation of the moderating roles that intrinsic motivation, LMX and POS play in the relationships of PFP perception and pay level satisfaction with the work outcomes provides evidence to the limited understanding about the conditions that may strengthen or weaken the effectiveness of PFP schemes.

The Incentive and Sorting Effects of Pay-for-Performance and Punishment-for-Underperformance

Literature Review of Studies on Pay System Effectiveness

The Effects of Perception of Pay-For-Performance and Self Efficacy on Pay Satisfaction

Effects Of Compensation Strategy On Psychological Contract - An Empirical Study In China

WHEN DOES PAY FOR PERFORMANCE MOTIVATE EMPLOYEE HELPING BEHAVIOR? THE CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCE OF PERFORMANCE SUBJECTIVITY

Calculated Punishment

The Impact of Pay-for-performance Perception and Pay Level Satisfaction on Employee Work Attitudes and Extra-Role Behaviors

Incentive Pay and Firm Productivity: Evidence from China

Delayed pay and employee turnover: The buffering role of pay‐for‐performance

Does Pay-for-performance Create More Ingratiation?From the Perspective of Conservation of Resources Theory

A Cognitive Evaluation and Equity-Based Perspective of Pay for Performance on Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis and Path Model

Incorporating Pay Basis into Pay Comparison: the Relationships among Over/Underpayment, Pay for Performance and Pay Level Satisfaction

Incentives to Move Up the Echelon: Impact of Inter-hierarchical Pay Gaps on Employee Performance

Excessive Incentive and Corporate Performance: Research Based on Marginal Diminishing Effect and Top Management Team of Chinese Listed Companies

A Study of Executive Compensation Incentives and Firm Performance

Cost Advantages of Punishments in Long Term Incentive

The Impact of Performance-based Pay Intensity on Pay Satisfaction: an Empirical Study

Unraveling the Relationship of Pay Dispersion and Turnover Intention among White-Collar Employees

Does Pay for Individual Performance Truly Undermine Employee Creativity? the Different Moderating Roles of Vertical and Horizontal Collectivist Orientations

Working Paper No . 5 33 Pay by Design : Teacher Performance Pay Design and the Distribution of Student Achievement By

Political Promotion, CEO Incentives, and the Relationship Between Pay and Performance