Abstract:Background: It remains unclear whether decreased femoral version (FV) causes anterior intra- or extra-articular femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Therefore, we evaluated symptomatic hips with decreased FV, with and without cam and pincer FAI, by using computed tomography (CT)-based virtual 3-dimensional (3D) impingement simulation and compared this group with patients with normal FV and with asymptomatic hips. Purpose: To investigate (1) the osseous range of motion, (2) the osseous femoral and acetabular impingement zones, and (3) whether hip impingement is extra- or intra-articular in symptomatic hips with FAI. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: An institutional review board-approved, retrospective comparative analysis was performed on a total of 84 hips in 68 participants. Of these, 37 hips in 24 symptomatic patients with FAI had decreased FV. These hips were compared with 21 hips of 18 symptomatic patients with anterior FAI with normal FV (10 degrees-25 degrees) and 26 asymptomatic hips with no FAI and normal FV. All patients with FAI were symptomatic and had anterior hip pain and a positive anterior impingement test. They underwent pelvic CT scans to measure FV. Decreased FV was defined as FV less than 5 degrees. The 37 hips with decreased FV presented both with and without cam and pincer FAI. All 84 hips were evaluated by use of CT-based 3D models and a validated 3D range of motion and impingement simulation. Asymptomatic hips were contralateral normal hips imaged in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Results: Hips with FAI combined with decreased FV had a significantly (P < .001) lower mean flexion (114 degrees +/- 8 degrees vs 125 degrees +/- 13 degrees) and internal rotation (IR) at 90 degrees of flexion (18 degrees +/- 6 degrees vs 32 degrees +/- 9 degrees, P < .001) compared with the asymptomatic control group. Symptomatic patients with FAI and normal FV had flexion of 120 degrees +/- 16 degrees and IR at 90 degrees of flexion of 23 degrees +/- 15 degrees. In a subgroup analysis, we found a significantly (P < .001) lower IR in 90 degrees of flexion in hips with FV less than 5 degrees combined with mixed-type FAI compared with hips with FV less than 5 degrees without a cam- or pincer-type deformity. The maximal acetabular impingement zone for hips with decreased FV was located at the 2-o'clock position and ranged from 1 to 3 o'clock. In hips with decreased FV, most of the impingement locations were intra-articular but 32% of hips had combined intra- and extra-articular FAI in internal rotation in 90 degrees of flexion. During the flexion-adduction-IR test performed in 10 degrees and 20 degrees of adduction, extra-articular subspine FAI had significantly (P < .001) higher prevalence (68% and 84%) in hips with decreased FV compared with normal hips. Conclusion: Hips with FAI and decreased FV had less flexion and internal rotation in 90 degrees of flexion compared with the asymptomatic control group. The majority of hip impingement due to low FV was intra-articular, but one-third of samples had combined intra- and extra-articular subspine FAI. Anterior extra- and intra-articular hip impingement can be present in patients who have FAI with decreased FV. This could be important for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

MRI-based 3D Models of the Pelvis Can Replace CT-based 3D Models for Range-of-Motion Analysis in Femoroacetabular Impingement

Patient-Specific 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Dynamic Simulation Of Hip Impingement And Range Of Motion Can Replace 3-D Computed Tomography-Based Simulation For Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: Implications For Planning Open Hip Preservation Surgery And Hip Arthroscopy

MRI-based 3D models of the hip joint enables radiation-free computer-assisted planning of periacetabular osteotomy for treatment of hip dysplasia using deep learning for automatic segmentation

3.0 T MRI Findings of Femoroacetabular Impingement

Radiomics features outperform standard radiological measurements in detecting femoroacetabular impingement on three‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging

MR-based Bony 3D models enable radiation-free preoperative patient-specific analysis and 3D printing for SCFE patients

Reliability of Conventional Hip MRI in Detecting Labral Tear and Labrocartilagenous Lesions in cases of Femoroacetabular Impingement, A Comparative Study with Hip Arthroscopy

Disease severity classification using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging data of cartilage in femoroacetabular impingement

Editorial Commentary: Magnetic Resonance Imaging May Underestimate Hip Femoral Version Versus Computed Tomography Scan: Both May Be Optimized Using 3-Dimensional Imaging

Automated volumetric and statistical shape assessment of cam-type morphology of the femoral head-neck region from 3D magnetic resonance images

Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients With Decreased Femoral Version Have Different Impingement Locations and Intra- and Extraarticular Anterior Subspine FAI on 3D-CT-Based Impingement Simulation: Implications for Hip Arthroscopy.

Measurement of acetabular version based on biplanar radiographs with 3D reconstructions in comparison to CT as reference standard in cadavers

Automated 3D quantitative assessment and measurement of alpha angles from the femoral head-neck junction using MR imaging

Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Acetabular Chondral Delamination in Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Significant systematic bias of alpha angles measured on MRI compared to various radiographic views in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

An Accurate Method of Radiological Assessment of Acetabular Abduction and Anteversion Angles in Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Multi-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography

An Integrated System for 3D Hip Joint Reconstruction from 2D X-rays: A Preliminary Validation Study

A comparative study of two pelvimetry methods: 3D models based on CT and MRI

VALIDATION OF A NEW METHOD FOR STANDARDIZED EVALUATION OF PELVIC RADIOGRAPHS

A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the human hip

Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip