Abstract:Purpose: The aims of this study were (1) to compare the areas of metal-induced artifacts and definition of periprosthetic structures between patients scanned with the slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting (SEMAC-VAT) turbo-spin-echo (TSE) prototype and those scanned with the standard TSE magnetic resonance (MR) sequences and (2) to further clarify the superiority of the SEMAC-VAT MR imaging technique at detecting lesions in patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA), compared with digital radiography (DR). Materials and methods: A total of 38 consecutive patients who underwent THA were referred to MR imaging at our institution. All patients suffered from chronic hip pain postoperatively. Twenty-three patients of the 38 were examined with a 1.5-T MR scanner using a SEMAC-VAT TSE prototype and standard TSE sequence, and the remaining 15 patients were examined with the same 1.5-T MR scanner, but using the SEMAC-VAT TSE prototype only. The traditional DR imaging was also performed for all patients. Two radiologists then independently measured the area of metal-induced artifacts and evaluated the definition of both the acetabular and femoral zones based on a three-point scale. Finally, the positive findings of chronic hip pain after THA based on SEMAC-VAT TSE MR imaging and traditional DR imaging were compared and analysed. Results: The areas of metal-induced artifacts were significantly smaller in the SEMAC-VAT TSE sequences than those in the standard TSE sequences for both the T1-weighted (p < 0.001) and T2-weighted (p < 0.001) turbo inversion recovery magnitude images. In addition, 28 patients showed a series of positive signs in the SEMAC-VAT images that were not observed in the traditional DR images. Conclusion: Compared with the standard TSE MR imaging, SEMAC-VAT MR imaging significantly reduces metal-induced artifacts and might successfully detect most positive signs missed in the traditional DR images. Translational potential of this article: The main objective of this research was to show that MR sequences from the SEMAC-VAT TSE prototype provide a significant advantage at detecting lesions in patients after THA because of the excellent soft-tissue resolution of the MR imaging. SEMAC-VAT MR can evaluate chronic hip pain after THA and determine the cause, which can help the clinician decide on whether a surgical revision is needed. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd on behalf of Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

Editorial Commentary: Magnetic Resonance Imaging May Underestimate Hip Femoral Version Versus Computed Tomography Scan: Both May Be Optimized Using 3-Dimensional Imaging

Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip

Discrepancies in Magnetic Resonance- and Computed Tomography-Based Femoral Version Measurements Despite Strong Correlations.

Editorial Commentary: The Gold Standard for Assessment of Hip Instability Is Three-Dimensional (3-D) Imaging.

Discrepancies in MR- and CT-Based Femoral Version Measurements Despite Strong Correlations

Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Acetabular Chondral Delamination in Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Significant systematic bias of alpha angles measured on MRI compared to various radiographic views in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip is dependent on specialist training of the radiologist

Editorial Commentary: Small Labral Size on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Indication for Labral Reconstruction in the Setting of Revision Hip Arthroscopy

The Value of Computed Tomography Scan in Three-dimensional Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Measurement of acetabular version based on biplanar radiographs with 3D reconstructions in comparison to CT as reference standard in cadavers

Reliability of Conventional Hip MRI in Detecting Labral Tear and Labrocartilagenous Lesions in cases of Femoroacetabular Impingement, A Comparative Study with Hip Arthroscopy

Radiological comparison of acetabular anteversion on roentgenograms and computed tomograms functional outcomes in total hip arthroplasty

Assessment Accuracy of 2D vs. 3D Imaging for Custom-Made Acetabular Implants in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

Comparisons of Slice-Encoding Metal Artifact Correction and View-Angle Tilting Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Traditional Digital Radiography in Evaluating Chronic Hip Pain after Total Hip Arthroplasty

Radiological comparison of acetabular anteversion on anteroposterior roentgenograms and computed tomograms functional outcomes in total hip arthroplasty

MRI of total hip arthroplasty: technical aspects and imaging findings

Radiological comparison of acetabular anteversion on cross-table lateral roentgenograms and computed tomograms functional outcomes in total hip arthroplasty

MRI-based synthetic CT of the hip: can it be an alternative to conventional CT in the evaluation of osseous morphology?

Advances in imaging for pre-surgical planning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Quantification of Imaging Error in the Measurement of Cup Position: A Cadaveric Comparison of Radiographic and Computed Tomography Imaging