Abstract:Traditional methodologies for measuring visual distraction have been limiting in their approaches, treating distraction as a one-dimensional variable. This has been accomplished either by categorizing distraction as a binary variable or using surrogate measurements, such as reaction time in response to non-driving related tasks, which follow the procedures of measuring distraction from psychology. Furthermore, as human-vehicle interaction (HVI) under automated driving has the potential to provide safety information and bring visual distraction simultaneously, there lacks an investigation on the quantitative relationship between distraction and safety due to the restrained methodologies in measuring visual distraction. As HVI-induced driver distraction plays a critical role in determining safe driving under automated driving, a methodology is highly needed to comprehensively measure the visual distraction under automated driving so that its impact on safety can be further investigated. Therefore, sticking to the definition of visual distraction, this research aims to (1) improve the existing methodology in measuring HVI-induced driver distraction under automated driving by focusing on visual distraction and mathematically describing it from spatiotemporal and directional dimensions; (2) theoretically investigate how the quantified visual distraction influences driving safety and (3) quantify the relationship between distraction and safety with introducing the "distraction-safety" ratio. Drivers' fixation behaviors are used in quantifying visual distraction, which is measured by spatiotemporal and directional relationships between drivers' visual attention and the attention that indicates "zero distraction". Three newly added performance measures in quantifying HVI-induced visual distraction are real-time magnitudes, real-time directions, and intensities (cumulation of magnitudes over time). To validate the proposed methods, a verification study was conducted by recruiting drivers to test automated driving under Level 3 automation. Drivers are required to wear an eye-tracker and go through two scenarios interacting with jaywalkers where takeover actions are needed with two takeover warnings ("visual-only" and "visual & audible"). Per past studies, takeover time was measured in representing distraction level. As a result, this study confirms the validity of the proposed methods by revealing the significant and positive correlations between the measured distraction intensity and the takeover time. Discussions of the quantified visual distraction from the spatiotemporal and directional perspective further enhance the understanding of HVI-induced driver distraction under automated driving through multiple dimensions. Furthermore, this research reveals how distracted driving affects safety under automated driving through the takeover performance. Thresholds under visual distraction magnitudes and degrees that lead to traffic conflicts were identified. More importantly, a "distraction-safety" ratio that quantifies the relationship between visual distraction and safety benefits is proposed. The results suggest that the "visual & audible" is more effective in significantly enhancing safety while aggregating a significantly smaller amount of visual distraction. The contribution of this research is to re-define the methodological approach of measuring visual distraction by (1) measuring distraction multi-dimensionally and (2) establishing a "distraction-safety" system in quantitatively assessing the balance of safety benefits and the HVI-induced visual distraction magnitude under automated driving environment.

The Analysis of Perception and Response Characteristics of Typical Intersection Conflicts in Driving Distractions

Influence of Distraction on Driver's Reaction Time to Traffic Conflicts

Analyzing the Influences of Driver Distractions Based on Driver's Subjective Cognition

Analysis and comparison of auditory-cognitive and visual-manual distraction risk characteristics and their effect on driving

The Impact Of Driver Cognitive Distraction On Vehicle Performance At Stop-Controlled Intersections

A Driving Simulator Study to Examine the Impact of Visual Distraction Duration from In-Vehicle Displays: Driving Performance, Detection Response, and Mental Workload

Study on Driving Behavior and Traffic Conflict at Highway Intersection

Effect of Driving Distractions on Driver Mental Workload in Work Zone’s Warning Area

A Survey on Vision-Based Driver Distraction Analysis.

Influence of Concurrent Task on Road Driver′s Behavior

Driver Behavior Mechanisms and Conflict Risk Patterns in Tunnel-Interchange Connecting Sections: A Comprehensive Investigation Based on the Behavioral Adaptation Theory

Distracted Driving under Angry: A Study on Driving Performance Analysis and Risk Detection

Road User's Behavior Analyses of Urban Intersections.

Transitioning to multi-dimensional estimation of visual distraction and its safety effects under automated driving: A spatiotemporal and directional estimation approach

Investigating the Influence of Connected Information on Driver Behaviour: an Analysis of Pedestrian-Vehicle Conflicts in the Middle Section of Urban Road

Analyses on Drivers' Performance at Urban Road Intersections Based on Self-Explaining Roads

Understanding Driver Response Patterns to Mental Workload Increase in Typical Driving Scenarios.

Detection of Driver Cognitive Distraction: A Comparison Study of Stop-Controlled Intersection and Speed-Limited Highway

A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Driving Behavior under Critical Situations: A Driving Simulator Study

Drivers' Avoidance Patterns in Near-Collision Intersection Conflicts

Analysis And Modeling Of Crossing Behavior At Urban Intersections In China