Abstract:Point, line and/or planar defects are ubiquitously present in all materials and intentional introduction and control of defects plays a key role in the development of advanced materials with better performance and new functionality. Well-known examples include doping semiconductors to modify the band structure and using phase or grain boundaries to strengthen alloys. Like other materials, battery intercalation compounds contain various types of defects, and “defect engineering” is a promising strategy for this class of materials, which nonetheless has not yet been widely explored. In particular, recent studies find that antisite defects in battery compounds, can promote Li transport by opening up alternative diffusion channels with lower migration energies in numerous lithium-ion battery electrode materials, which enhances the rate performance of batteries. Antisite defects are also reported to improve the stability and cyclability of cubic LixTi2O4. These examples demonstrate that the rational tailoring of antisite defects provides a potentially general approach to improving battery electrode properties. Here we present a computational study that reveals a new mechanism of antisite defects enhancing the rate capability of intercalation compounds by accelerating surface-reaction-limited (SRL) phase transformation during battery charge/discharge. Antisite defects are generated when the sites of intercalating ions are occupied by other cations that are usually less mobile. A prominent effect of antisite defects in battery electrodes is to block the existing paths of intercalating ions and generate new migration pathways at the same time. For intercalation compounds with strong anisotropic transport properties, such effect usually leads to the reduction in the diffusion anisotropy of intercalating ions, which has already been observed in practically synthesized lithium iron phosphate olivine (LiFePO4). In this work, we discovered that although antisite defects in LiFePO4 impede Li movement in the fast [010] diffusion direction, their ability to enhance transport along other slower diffusion directions leads to an unexpected increase in the phase transition rate when it is kinetically limited by surface reaction. Figure 1. compares the discharge simulations of two LiFePO4 particles with different antisite defect concentrations. Orders-of-magnitude improvement in SRL phase transformation kinetics is observed in “defect-rich” particle due to the increase of active surface area for Li intercalation. More transparent understanding of such mechanism was obtained by solving 1D depth-average model numerically and analytically. Meanwhile, it is revealed that the presence of defects causes Li intercalation time to increase less pronouncedly with particle sizes, and can reduce the risk of electrochemical shock under galvanostatic (dis)charge conditions by homogenizing the reaction flux. Due to the kinetic competition between surface reaction and bulk diffusion, an optimal defect concentration is predicted to exist for a given particle geometry to maximize the Li (de)intercalation rate. Criteria for the co-design of defect content and particle morphology are proposed. Counter-intuitively, we find that (100)-oriented LiFePO4 platelike particles may exhibit even better rate performance than (010)-oriented plate particles in the SRL kinetic regime, which are commonly viewed as the most desirable LiFePO4 particle morphology. While we demonstrate the possibility of using antisite defects to accelerate phase transitions in LiFePO4, it has general applicability to other phase-changing battery materials that exhibit ion diffusion anisotropy. Figure 1

Defect Chemistry: Defect Chemistry in Discharge Products of Li-O<sub>2</sub> Batteries (Small Methods 3/2019)

Defect Chemistry in Discharge Products of Li-O-2 Batteries

Defect Chemistry in Discharge Products of Li–O2 Batteries

Defect Engineering for Expediting Li–S Chemistry: Strategies, Mechanisms, and Perspectives

Defect Chemistry in High‐Voltage Cathode Materials for Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Defect Engineering on Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Batteries

Defect physics in complex energy materials

Defect Strategy in Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

Defect-Enhanced Phase Transformation Kinetics in Intercalation Compounds

Defect Chemistry on Electrode Materials for Electrochemical Energy Storage and Conversion

Direct Observation of Ordered Oxygen Defects on the Atomic Scale in Li2o2 for Li-O-2 Batteries

Defect Engineering in a Multiple Confined Geometry for Robust Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Tunable Oxygen Vacancies of Cobalt Oxides in Lithium-Oxygen Batteries: Morphology Control of Discharge Product

Linking the Defects to the Formation and Growth of Li Dendrite in All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Mechanistic Insights into the Discharge Processes of Li−CO2 Batteries

Progress in Mechanistic Understanding and Characterization Techniques of Li-S Batteries

Facilitating catalytic activity of indium oxide in lithium-sulfur batteries by controlling oxygen vacancies

Interfacial Effects On Lithium Superoxide Disproportionation In Li-O-2 Batteries

The local lithium plating caused by anode crack defect in Li-ion battery

Interfacial "Single‐Atom‐in‐Defects" Catalysts Accelerating Li+ Desolvation Kinetics for Long‐lifespan Lithium Metal Batteries