Comparative safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sulfonylureas in older adults across levels of frailty

J Sultana,D Kim,K Huybrechts,S Schneeweiss,R J Glynn,J Barberio,E Patorno
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igy023.3180
2018-01-01
Innovation in Aging
Abstract:A propensity-score matched cohort study was conducted in two US commercial insurance databases, including 365,816 adults ≥60 years with type 2 diabetes who initiated dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) or sulfonylureas. We assessed the risk of a composite endpoint of cardiovascular events, fractures, and severe hypoglycemia comparing DPP4i and sulfonylureas in persons with mild (CFI <0.15), moderate (0.15–0.24) and severe frailty (≥0.25). Compared with sulfonylureas, DPP4i were associated with fewer outcomes: the hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval) for mild, moderate and severe frailty were 0.62 (0.54–0.70), 0.67 (0.57–0.78) and 0.63 (0.55–0.73), respectively. With increasing levels of frailty, DPP4i were associated with decreasing cardiovascular protection (HRs for mild, moderate, and severe frailty: 0.77, 0.86, 0.99), and with a non-significant reduction in fractures (HRs: 1.17, 0.84, 0.80). Severe hypoglycemia was consistently lower with DPP4i across frailty levels (HRs: 0.39, 0.52, 0.46). This information is useful for diabetes management in older adults.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?