Do Leading Scientists in Emerging Countries Contribute to Knowledge Local Diffusion?

Qiu Shumin,Delin Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.16535abstract
2018-01-01
Abstract:This research aims to respond to the increasing criticisms on leading scientists in emerging countries: whether they are at the expense of government support to gain high status in academia, but yield limited knowledge diffusion to local firms. Based on our investigation in Chinese nano-technology field during 2001-2011, we found that leading scientists in China less likely engage in knowledge local diffusion, either through licensing patents to firms or through joint research with firm. “Stickiness” of academic status lead to status inconsistency between academia and business sector. Status inconsistency hinders leading scientists’ entry into industry. We also found that government certification and scientists’ international connections have significant moderating effect to attenuate the negative relationship between academic status and knowledge transfer. Accompanied by general status signals (government certification and ties to prominent actors), field-specific status (academic status) can be more transferable cross domains, thus can overcome status inconsistency and enhance knowledge transfer from leading scientists. Our research provided a status- based view to understand knowledge transfer activities, and answered under what conditions the status concerns will promote or inhibit leading scientists’ entry into industry.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?