[P4–274]: COMPARISON OF BINDING PROPERTIES OF THK5117, THK5351, PBB3 AND T807 IN AUTOPSIES OF ALZHEIMER DISEASE CASES

Laetitia Lemoine,Per‐Göran Gillberg,Marie Svedberg,Vladimir Stepanov,Sangram Nag,He Tian,Makoto Higuchi,Christer Halldin,Agneta Nordberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.2143
2017-01-01
Abstract:Several families of tau PET tracers recently developed have been studied in vivo in patients after having shown good in vitro binding-properties. Some differences in binding properties have been observed between the tau PET tracers in Alzheimer disease and non-AD tauopathies. Recent observations report presence of off-target binding. Here we aimed at characterizing the binding properties as well as possible off-target binding of the tau tracers by comparing two THK compounds, THK5117 and THK5351 with T807 and PBB3, head-to-head in the same human brain tissue, using autoradiography on large frozen section from AD cases and binding assay in brain homogenates. Autoradiographies on large frozen section were done using 3H-THK5351, 3H-THK5117, 11C-THK5351, 11C-PBB3 and 18F-T807. Competition autoradiography using unlabeled T807 were performed for the 11C compound. In vitro binding assay competition using 3H-THK5351 with unlabeled THK5351, THK5117 and T807 were performed in hippocampus homogenates. Competitions binding assay and autoradiography were performed using 3H-THK5117, 3H-L-deprenyl with unlabeled THK5117, R-deprenyl, rasagiline and chlorgyline to characterize the MAO off-target component. 11C-PPB3, 11C-THK5351 and 18F-T807 showed similar regional distribution in autoradiography but with different intensity. Unlabeled THK5351 displaced 50% of 11C-THK5351 binding and less than 10% of 11C-PBB3 binding in all regions. Unlabeled PBB3 displaced 50 % of 11C-PBB3 binding. Unlabeled T807 displaced up to 70 % of 18F-T807 binding in frontal and temporal cortex, 30% of 11C-THK5351 in frontal and temporal cortex and up to 40% in the basal ganglia, and displaced less than 20 %of 11C-PBB3 in all regions. In vitro binding assay using 3H-THK5351 in competition with unlabeled THK5351, THK5117 and T807 showed at least two binding sites. While a 4 times differences in affinity for the binding site in nanomolar range was observed between THK5351 and T807, they shared one binding site in the picomolar range. Tau tracers from three different families showed all different binding properties in AD cases. Greater similarity in binding properties was observed between THK5351 and T807 than with PBB3. These results may have an influence on the outcome of the clinical use in vivo PET study targeting different form of tauopathies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?