EXPLORING AV1451 BINDING THROUGH BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL ANALYSIS OF PHF TAU FROM HUMAN AND TG4510 BRAINS WITH ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

Xiyun Chai,Kelly Conway,Jing Xu,Suchira Bose,Nancy Kant,Giorgio Attardo,Bradley B. Miller,Jeffrey L. Dage
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.1729
2016-01-01
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Abstract:One of the pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are intracellular neurofibrillary tangles. These have been purified from postmortem human brain and characterized as paired helical filaments (PHF), consisting of hyperphosphorylated tau isoforms. Recently tau pathology, correlating with cognitive decline and neurodegeneration in AD, was shown to be detected in living human subjects with a PET tracer, AV1451. However, binding is not replicated in the Tg4510 tau mouse model. The Tg4510 mouse overexpresses a 0N4R human tau isoform with the P301L mutation. In this study we sought to investigate the biochemical and biophysical basis for the AV1451 binding discrepancy between purified PHF from human AD brain and Tg4510 mouse brain. PHF tau from AD and Tg4510 brain tissue was affinity purified with an MC1 column. The AT8 and MC1 content were determined by AT8 and MC1 ELISA and normalized by tau content. The binding activity of PHF tau with AV1451 was determined by radio-ligand binding assay. Percent helical content and fragment length of purified PHF was determined using a quantitative electron microscopy (EM) analysis method. There was no significant difference in AT8 and MC1 content between AD and Tg4510 PHF tau. However, AD PHF demonstrated dose dependent specific binding with AV1451 while PHF tau from Tg4510 did not show any specific binding. We found no significant difference in the fragment length between AD and Tg4510 PHF tau, but percent helical structure was significantly higher in AD (83%) compared with Tg4510 PHF tau (42%). PHF tau from AD brain bind AV1451 specifically but PHF tau from Tg4510 does not have any specific binding. Even though there is no significant difference in the biochemical property in terms of AT8 and MC1 content in the PHF from AD and Tg4510, the quantitative EM analysis shows that there is significant difference in the percentage helical structure between purified PHF from AD brain and Tg4510 mouse brain.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?