Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009The separation of P‐wave and S‐wave from crosswell seismic data and applicationAuthors: Jiangping LiuXiangzhi ZengJianghai XiaSamba charlesJiangping LiuInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of GeosciencesSearch for more papers by this author, Xiangzhi ZengInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of GeosciencesSearch for more papers by this author, Jianghai XiaKansas Geological Survey, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this author, and Samba charlesInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of GeosciencesSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255093 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Compared to the surface seismic record and VSP record, the cross‐well seismic records of wave field is more complex. The separation of the P‐wave and S‐wave seismic section is important for interpretation and imaging. This paper discusses a new method that takes into consideration the characteristics of apparent velocity and polarization during both P‐wave and S‐wave propagations. In Approximating the Earth as an elastic body, P‐wave and S‐waves propagate independently through the internal part of the Earth. The wave field recorded at cross‐well geophones is a mixed wave field. Because of low S‐wave velocity, for a given frequency, its wavelength is shorter (which has a higher vertical resolution). In addition, we can get more information in interpretation by integrating both P‐wave and S‐wave than a single‐component. Many works about the separation of P‐ and S‐wave have been carried out. With the development of the seismic exploration, the wavefield separation techniques are getting more advanced. But most tradition P‐wave and S‐wave separation methods are based on the apparent velocity and polarization differences between P‐wave and S‐wave. For example, polarization rotation transform (Li and Cui, 1994) is due to the different polarization orientation between P‐wave and S‐wave; but the transform results are from the different apparent velocity (Trad, 2003). The tradition methods are difficult in ascertaining the polarization angle, which is sensitive to noise. The latest one (Trad, 2003) has a wider application, but there is no use when P‐wave and S‐wave interfere each other (Turner, 1990). At present, the main methods are wave equation methods and polarization separation methods, which both need P‐wave and S‐wave velocity information. From the full wave logging data and acoustic logging data, the velocity measurement is very different from the real velocity. While the polarization direction is very sensitive to the velocity information, the error of velocity measurement from logging data can have a great impact on the separated result. Compared to the traditional method in separating P‐wave from S‐wave, the method discussed in this paper does not use P‐wave and S‐wave velocities so it avoids the influence of the error in velocity measurements from logging data. Thus a more accurate result can be obtained. The processing of model testing and real crosswell data shows the accuracy and effectiveness of this method.Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255093FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2009 Pages: 4338 publication data© 2009 Copyright © 2009 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 14 Oct 2009 CITATION INFORMATION Jiangping Liu, Xiangzhi Zeng, Jianghai Xia, and Samba charles, (2009), "The separation of P‐wave and S‐wave from crosswell seismic data and application," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 1320-1324. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255093 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...

Seismic Data Interpolation with Polar Fourier Transform

De-aliased Seismic Data Interpolation Using Seislet Transform with Low-Frequency Constraint

Accurate and efficient seismic data interpolation using FK-curvelet transform

Seismic Data Interpolation Based on Radial Basis Function

Double acceleration of the amplitude preserving generalized S transform for seismic data attenuation compensation

Spectral decomposition using deconvolutive short time Fourier transform spectrogram

Improving the S-transform for High-Resolution Reservoir Prediction and Paleochannels Delineation

Recovering the Most from Big Gaps Using Least-Squares Inversion

Accurate and Efficient Seismic Data Interpolation in the Principal Frequency Wavenumber Domain

Deblending by Iterative Orthogonalization and Seislet Thresholding

Blind Restoration of Poststack 3D Seismic Data

An edge-preserving seismic data interpolation method

Dealiased seismic data interpolation by dynamic matching

Multi-step Reconstruction of 3D Seismic Data Via an Improved Multichannel Singular Spectrum Analysis Algorithm

Simultaneous seismic data de‐aliasing and denoising with a fast adaptive method based on hybrid wavelet transform

Multidimensional Seismic Data Reconstruction with Multiple Constraints

A Method for Non-Orthogonal Seismic Polarization-Vector Separation

Comparison of Wavelet Selection and Band‐pass Filtering for Noise Removal for Seismic Data Processing

The Separation of P‐wave and S‐wave from Crosswell Seismic Data and Application

Improving Data Quality of Three-Component Measurements of Noise in Urban Environments Using Polarization Analysis

Frequency-velocity-adaptive Seismic Modeling Using a Generalized Average-Derivative Optimal Scheme