Application of deghosting for spectral matching in OBS-streamer 4D processing
Zhiyuan Wei,Yi Xuan,Rongxin Huang,Christian Theriot,Douglas Rodenberger,Mark Chang,Scott A. Morton,Mehdi Zouari
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13872129.1
2016-01-01
SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016Application of deghosting for spectral matching in OBS-streamer 4D processingAuthors: Zhiyuan WeiYi XuanRongxin HuangChristian TheriotDouglas RodenbergerMark ChangScott MortonMehdi ZouariZhiyuan WeiCGGSearch for more papers by this author, Yi XuanCGGSearch for more papers by this author, Rongxin HuangCGGSearch for more papers by this author, Christian TheriotShell GlobalSearch for more papers by this author, Douglas RodenbergerShell GlobalSearch for more papers by this author, Mark ChangAnadarko Petroleum CorporationSearch for more papers by this author, Scott MortonHessSearch for more papers by this author, and Mehdi ZouariAnadarkoSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13872129.1 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Large spectral differences exist between streamer and ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) data, mostly due to different surface-related ghost effects – streamer data have both shot- and receiver-side ghosts, while OBS data have only the shot-side ghost. In a recent OBS-streamer time lapse study in deepwater Gulf of Mexico, we investigated three schemes of spectral matching between OBS and streamer data: conventional 1D matching of streamer to OBS, receiver deghosting of streamer data only, and full deghosting of both data sets. The study demonstrated the benefits of receiver deghosting on streamer data over 1D matching, particularly because it provided a better match between the streamer and OBS data before migration and an increased 4D signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) after migration. However, we found that shot deghosting on both surveys did not improve the 4D results; instead, the spectra of streamer and OBS, especially at lower frequencies, were more different after shot deghosting. Receiver deghosting alone on the streamer data gave the best 4D results among the three schemes. Presentation Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 Start Time: 10:45:00 AM Location: 150 Presentation Type: ORAL Keywords: 4D, time-lapse, ocean-bottom nodePermalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13872129.1FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byImproving subsalt reservoir imaging with reflection FWI: An OBN case study at Conger field, Gulf of MexicoFeng Lin, Biniam Asmerom, Rongxin Huang, Brad Kuntz, Carter Gehman, and Mehmet Tanis27 August 2018Improving OBS-streamer 4D imaging by least-squares migrationZhao Wang, Rongxin Huang, Yi Xuan, Qing Xu, Scott Morton, and Brad Kuntz17 August 2017Time Lapse Complete Session17 August 2017The value of 4D seismic: Has the promise been fulfilled?J. P. Blangy, Mosab Nasser, and Dan Maguire2 May 2017 | The Leading Edge, Vol. 36, No. 5 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2016 Pages: 5654 publication data© 2016 Published in electronic format with permission by the Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 01 Sep 2016 CITATION INFORMATION Zhiyuan Wei, Yi Xuan, Rongxin Huang, Christian Theriot, Douglas Rodenberger, Mark Chang, Scott Morton, and Mehdi Zouari, (2016), "Application of deghosting for spectral matching in OBS-streamer 4D processing," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 5506-5510. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13872129.1 Plain-Language Summary Keywords4Dtime-lapseocean-bottom nodePDF DownloadLoading ...