Abstract:The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox gives an argument for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics based on the premises of local realism. A general view is that the argument is compromised, because EPR's premises are falsified by Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) and Bell experiments. In this paper, we present an EPR argument based on premises not falsifiable by these experiments. We propose macroscopic EPR and GHZ experiments using spins $S_\theta$ defined by two macroscopically distinct states. The analyzers that realize the unitary operations $U_\theta$ determining the measurement settings $\theta$ are devices that create macroscopic superposition states. For a system with two macroscopically distinct states available, macroscopic realism (MR) posits a predetermined outcome for a measurement $S_\theta$ distinguishing between the states. Deterministic macroscopic realism (dMR) posits MR for the system prior to the interaction $U_\theta$. Weak macroscopic realism (wMR) posits MR for the system after $U_\theta$, at the time $t_f$ (when the system is prepared for a final "pointer" measurement), the outcome of $S_\theta$ not being changed by interactions that might occur at a remote system $B$. The premise also posits that if the outcome for $S_\theta^A$ of a system $A$ can be predicted by a pointer measurement on a system $B$ defined after the interaction fixing the setting at $B$, then the outcome for $S_\theta^A$ is determined at this time. The GHZ predictions negate dMR but are consistent with wMR. Yet, an EPR paradox arises based on wMR for the set-up proposed by Schrödinger, where one measures two complementary spins simultaneously, "one by direct, the other by indirect" measurement. We revisit the original EPR paradox and find similarly that an EPR argument can be based on a weak form of local realism not falsifiable by GHZ or Bell tests.

Less Reality, More Security

Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered incomplete?

Seventy Years of the EPR Paradox

On some EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen) issues

Against "Reality" in Physics

Introduction to Volume 15 of The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. The Berlin Years: Writings and Correspondence June 1925 - May 1927

The Synge G-Method: cosmology, wormholes, firewalls, geometry

Why Bohr was wrong in his response to EPR

The Ultimate Physical Limits of Privacy

Les inégalités de Bell et l'article Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, une relecture

From Einstein's Theorem to Bell's Theorem: A History of Quantum Nonlocality

An Underappreciated Exchange in the Bohr--Einstein Debate

The Weak Reality That Makes Quantum Phenomena More Natural: Novel Insights and Experiments

The EPR paradox, Bell's inequality, and the question of locality

Epistemic Horizons: This Sentence is $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|True\rangle + |False\rangle)$

Essay: reflections on Physical Review Letters.

Erratum: Quantum Privacy Amplification and the Security of Quantum Cryptography over Noisy Channels [phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2818 (1996)]

Some Unrecorded Science History. My Brush with Einstein's Relativistic Length Contraction

In Our Mind's Eye: Thinkable and Unthinkable, and Classical and Quantum in Fundamental Physics, with Schrödinger's Cat Experiment

An Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument based on weak forms of local realism not falsifiable by GHZ or Bell experiments