Non–Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography Using T2-Weighted 3-Dimensional Fat-Suppressed Turbo Spin Echo (SPACE)

Qiong Song,Mengsu Zeng,Caizhong Chen,Jing Ma,Hong Yun,Shengxiang Rao,Xiuzhong Yao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0b013e31826999df
2012-01-01
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Abstract:Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of non–contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (non–CE-MRA) using SPACE (“Sampling Perfection with Application optimized Contrasts using different flip angle Evolutions”) in comparison with CE-MRA using volume interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) in the detection of portosystemic and portohepatic collaterals. Methods Thirty consecutively enrolled cirrhotic patients with suspicion of portosystemic and portohepatic collaterals underwent SPACE followed by VIBE at 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. The contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and scores of the portal vein segments and overall image were used to compare the diagnostic performance of SPACE with that of VIBE. The paired Student t test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for statistical analysis. Results Diagnostic results of SPACE were equivalent to those of VIBE. However, both the signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of portal vein segments in the former were better than those in the latter (P < 0.0001), and the scores of displaying the portal vein distal branches in SPACE were higher than those in VIBE (P < 0.05). Conclusions The SPACE has a comparable ability in demonstrating portosystemic and portohepatic collaterals as well as VIBE does.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?