Heat transport by turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection forPr≃ 0.8 and 3 × 1012≲Ra≲ 1015: aspect ratio Γ = 0.50

Guenter Ahlers,Xiaozhou He,Denis Funfschilling,Eberhard Bodenschatz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/103012

2012-01-01

New Journal of Physics

Abstract:We report on the experimental results for heat-transport measurements, in the form of the Nusselt number Nu, by turbulent Rayleigh–Benard convection (RBC) in a cylindrical sample of aspect ratio Γ ≡ D/L = 0.50 (D = 1.12 m is the diameter and L = 2.24 m the height). The measurements were made using sulfur hexafluoride at pressures up to 19 bar as the fluid. They are for the Rayleigh-number range 3 × 1012 ≲ Ra ≲ 1015 and for Prandtl numbers Pr between 0.79 and 0.86. For Ra < Ra*1 ≃ 1.4 × 1013 we find Nu = N0 Raγeff with γeff = 0.312 ± 0.002, which is consistent with classical turbulent RBC in a system with laminar boundary layers below the top and above the bottom plate. For Ra*1 < Ra < Ra*2 (with Ra*2 ≃ 5 × 1014) γeff gradually increases up to 0.37 ± 0.01. We argue that above Ra*2 the system is in the ultimate state of convection where the boundary layers, both thermal and kinetic, are also turbulent. Several previous measurements for Γ = 0.50 are re-examined and compared with our results. Some of them show a transition to a state with γeff in the range from 0.37 to 0.40, albeit at values of Ra in the range from 9 × 1010 to 7 × 1011 which is much lower than the present Ra*1 or Ra*2. The nature of the transition found by them is relatively sharp and does not reveal the wide transition range observed in this work. In addition to the results for the genuine Rayleigh–Benard system, we present measurements for a sample which was not completely sealed; the small openings permitted external currents, imposed by density differences and gravity, to pass through the sample. That system should no longer be regarded as genuine RBC because the externally imposed currents modified the heat transport in a major way. It showed a sudden decrease of γeff from 0.308 for Ra < Rat ≃ 4 × 1013 to 0.25 for larger Ra. A number of possible experimental effects are examined in a sequence of appendices; none of these effects is found to have a significant influence on the measurements.