Abstract:This paper presents the dual‐stream frequency‐spatial fusion network for deepfake detection, which integrates spatial and frequency domain features to enhance detection accuracy and robustness. The network includes a spatial forgery feature extraction module, a frequency forgery feature extraction module, and a spatial‐frequency feature fusion module, using attention mechanisms to extract and fuse features. Extensive experiments demonstrate that dual‐stream frequency‐spatial fusion network outperforms existing methods, offering superior generalization and robustness across various deepfake datasets. In recent years, face forgery detection has gained significant attention, resulting in considerable advancements. However, most existing methods rely on CNNs to extract artefacts from the spatial domain, overlooking the pervasive frequency‐domain artefacts present in deepfake content, which poses challenges in achieving robust and generalized detection. To address these issues, we propose the dual‐stream frequency—spatial fusion network is proposed for deepfake detection. The dual‐stream frequency‐spatial fusion network consists of three components: the spatial forgery feature extraction module, the frequency forgery feature extraction module, and the spatial–frequency feature fusion module. The spatial forgery feature extraction module employs spatial‐channel attention to extract spatial domain features, targeting artefacts in the spatial domain. The frequency forgery feature extraction module leverages the focused linear attention to detect frequency domain anomalies in internal regions, enabling the identification of generated content. The spatial–frequency feature fusion module then fuses forgery features extracted from both the spatial and frequency domains, facilitating accurate detection of splicing artefacts and internally generated forgeries. This approach enhances the model's ability to more accurately capture forgery characteristics. Extensive experiments on several widely‐used benchmarks demonstrate that our carefully designed network exhibits superior generalization and robustness, significantly improving deepfake detection performance.

Exposing Deepfake Videos with Spatial, Frequency and Multi-scale Temporal Artifacts

Refining Localized Attention Features with Multi-Scale Relationships for Enhanced Deepfake Detection in Spatial-Frequency Domain

Spatio-temporal Features for Generalized Detection of Deepfake Videos

FakeTransformer: Exposing Face Forgery From Spatial-Temporal Representation Modeled By Facial Pixel Variations

Multi-feature fusion based face forgery detection with local and global characteristics

Analyzing temporal coherence for deepfake video detection

Dynamic Difference Learning with Spatio-temporal Correlation for Deepfake Video Detection

Detecting Deepfake Videos Based on Spatiotemporal Attention and Convolutional LSTM

Learning spatial‐frequency interaction for generalizable deepfake detection

Video Detection Method Based on Temporal and Spatial Foundations for Accurate Verification of Authenticity

Unmasking DeepFakes with simple Features

Noise-aware progressive multi-scale deepfake detection

Deepfake Detection Based on the Adaptive Fusion of Spatial‐Frequency Features

Anti-Forensics for Face Swapping Videos via Adversarial Training

A survey on face forgery detection of Deepfake

It Wasn’t Me: Irregular Identity in Deepfake Videos

Multi-attentional Deepfake Detection

Deepfake detection in videos with multiple faces using geometric-fakeness features

A defensive framework for deepfake detection under adversarial settings using temporal and spatial features

UniForensics: Face Forgery Detection via General Facial Representation

Dual-Modality Co-Learning for Unveiling Deepfake in Spatio-Temporal Space.